Prague Economic Papers 2024, 33(4):414-443 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.870

Exploration of the Size Effect on Transaction Data of Non-publicly Traded EU Companies

Tomáš Podškubka ORCID..., Štěpán Kohoutek ORCID..., Jana Skálová ORCID...
Faculty of Finance and Accounting, Prague University of Economics and Business, Prague, Czech Republic

This paper examines the effect of company size on transaction multiples. The existence of the size effect has been investigated by a number of authors who have primarily used data for publicly traded companies for their research. Our research works with data from private transactions with non-traded companies (shares) from the EU. The transaction price concluded in these deals is decomposed into the product of profit and transaction multiple as when using market comparison valuation methods. Transaction multiples are relative types of financial metrics that typically compare various levels of profit such as EBITDA, EBIT or EAT to a value that an investor is willing to pay to acquire a given company. The objective of this paper is to confirm the hypothesis that larger companies are purchased for higher profit multiples than smaller companies. Accordingly, in the context of DCF valuation methods, higher profit multiples correspond to a lower discount rate and vice versa. However, it should be noted that despite the large amount of research conducted, the existence of the size effect is still not confirmed or refuted at present.

Keywords: company size, profit multiple, logarithmic regression
JEL classification: F23, G12, G34

Received: February 26, 2024; Revised: April 29, 2024; Accepted: June 15, 2024; Published: August 30, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Podškubka, T., Kohoutek, Š., & Skálová, J. (2024). Exploration of the Size Effect on Transaction Data of Non-publicly Traded EU Companies. Prague Economic Papers, 33(4), 414-443. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.870
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Baethe, J., Kirsch, H.-J., Koelen, P., Schulz, R. (2010). On the Myth of Size Premiums in Corporate Valuation: Some Empirical Evidence from the German Stock Market. Journal of Applied Research in Accounting and Finance, 5(1), 2-15.
    2. Banz, R. W. (1981). The Relationship between Return and Market Value of Common Stocks. Journal of Financial Economics, 9, 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(81)90018-0 Go to original source...
    3. Betton, S., Eckbo, B. E., Thorburn, K. S. (2009). Merger Negotiations and the Toehold Puzzle. Journal of Financial Economics, 91(2), 158-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.02.004 Go to original source...
    4. Berk, J. B. (1995). A Critique of Size-Related Anomalies. The Review of Financial Studies, 8, 275-286. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/8.2.275 Go to original source...
    5. Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., Allen, F. (2020). Principles of Corporate Finance. 13th ed. New York: McGraw Hill. ISBN: 978-1-260-01390-0.
    6. Brown, P., Kleidon, A. W., Marsh, T. A. (1983). New Evidence on the Nature of Size-related Anomalies in Stock Prices. Journal of Applied Research in Accounting and Finance, 12(1), 33-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(83)90026-0 Go to original source...
    7. Carhart, M. M. (1997). On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57-82. https://doi.org/10.2307/2329556 Go to original source...
    8. Crain, M. A. (2011). A Literature Review of the Size Effect. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1710076 Go to original source...
    9. Damodaran, A. (2015). The Small Cap Premium: Where Is the Beef? Business Valuation Review, 34(4), 152-157. https://doi.org/10.5791/0882-2875-34.4.152 Go to original source...
    10. Van Dijk, M. A. (2011). Is Size Dead? A Review of the Size Effect in Equity Returns. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(12), 3263-3274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.05.009 Go to original source...
    11. Fama, E. F., French, K. R. (1992). The Cross Section of Expected Stock Returns. Journal of Finance, 47, 427-465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04398.x Go to original source...
    12. Fama, E. F., French, K. R. (2018). Choosing Factors. Journal of Financial Economics, 128(2), 234-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.02.012 Go to original source...
    13. Horowitz, J. L., Loughran, T., Savin, N. E. (2000). The Disappearing Size Effect. Research in Economics, 54(1), 83-100. https://doi.org/10.1006/reec.1999.0207 Go to original source...
    14. Hou, K., van Dijk, M. A. (2018). Resurrecting the Size Effect: Firm Size, Profitability Shocks, and Expected Stock Returns. The Review of Financial Studies, 32(7), 2850-2889. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhy104 Go to original source...
    15. Hou, K., Xue, C., Zhang, L. (2015). Digesting Anomalies: An Investment Approach. Review Of Financial Studies, 28(3), 650-705. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu068 Go to original source...
    16. Jeřábek, T., Čihák, P. (2008). Kvantifikace Prémie za Velikost pro Střední Evropu. Odhadce a Oceňování Majetku, 1(2), 44-49.
    17. Lamoureux, C. G., Sanger, G. C. (1989). Firm Size and Turn-of-the-Year Effects in the OTC/NASDAQ Market. The Journal of Finance, 44(5), 1219-1245. https://doi.org/10.2307/2328640 Go to original source...
    18. Mařík, M. (2018). Metody Oceňování Podniku: Proces Ocenění, Základní Metody a Postupy. Čtvrté upravené a rozšířené vydání. Praha: Ekopress, ISBN: 978-80-87865-38-5. Go to original source...
    19. Peek, E. (2019). A Study of Differences in Returns between Large and Small Companies in Europe. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2499205 Go to original source...
    20. Petersen, C., Plenborg, T., Scholer, F. (2006). Issues in Valuation of Privately Held Firms. The Journal of Private Equity, 10(1), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpe.2006.667557 Go to original source...
    21. Pratt, S. P. (2005). The Market Approach to Valuing Businesses. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. ISBN: 978-0-471-69654-4.
    22. Pratt, S. P., Reilly, R. F., Schweihs, R. P. (2008). Valuing a Business. New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0071441803
    23. Pratt, S. P., Reilly, R. F., Schweihs, R. P. (2014). Cost of Capital: Applications and Examples. 5th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. ISBN: 978-1-118-85280-4.
    24. Pratt, S. P., Nivulita, A. V. (2008). Valuing a Business: The Analysis and Appraisal of Closely Held Companies. 5th ed, New York: McGraw Hill. ISBN: 978-007-144180-3.
    25. Pratt, S. (2022). Valuing a Business. 6th ed. McGraw Hill, ISBN: 978-1260121568.
    26. Prodělal, F. (2009). Přirážka za Tržní Kapitalizaci při Stanovení Nákladů na Vlastní Kapitál Metodou CAPM. Available at: http://www.znaleckyportal.cz
    27. Reinganum, M. R. (1981). Misspecification of Capital Asset Pricing: Empirical Anomalies based on Earnings' Yields and Market Values. Journal of Financial Economics, 9(1), 19-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(81)90019-2 Go to original source...
    28. Skálová, J., Podškubka, T., Diviš, P. (2018). Vliv Velikosti Podniku na Transakční Násobitele. Politická Ekonomie, 66(1). 57-77, https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.1181 Go to original source...
    29. Tarbell, J. S. (1999). The Small Company Risk Premium: Does It Really Exist? American Society of Appraisers, 18th Annual Advanced Business Valuation Conference, New Orleans, LA.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content