Prague Economic Papers 2022, 31(2):119-142 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.798

Redistributive Policies of EU Member Countries in the Context of Welfare Regimes

Peter Tóth ORCID...a, Andrea Tkáčová ORCID...a, Katarína Muµováa
a Department of Finance, Faculty of Economics, Technical University of Koąice, Slovakia

This paper aims to use cluster analysis to monitor changes in the social regimes of EU countries in the context of their economic situation. In the first step, the paper provides an overview of theoretical studies and categorizes countries into individual social regimes based on available studies. Subsequently, hierarchical cluster analyses are performed for 2007 and 2019, one for a group of redistributive variables and one for socio-economic variables. The cluster analysis confirmed that differences among individual social regimes are blurred over time, and belonging to a social regime does not automatically lead to occurrence in the same cluster. The new and old member states are mixed in terms of redistributive variables, while economic differences among these countries are still present.

Keywords: Redistributive policy, welfare regimes, social equality, EU countries
JEL classification: C01, H53, I31, R13

Received: November 18, 2021; Revised: January 4, 2022; Accepted: February 3, 2022; Prepublished online: March 25, 2022; Published: May 9, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Tóth, P., Tkáčová, A., & Muµová, K. (2022). Redistributive Policies of EU Member Countries in the Context of Welfare Regimes. Prague Economic Papers31(2), 119-142. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.798
Download citation

References

  1. Abu Sharkh, M., Gough, I. (2010). Global Welfare Regimes: A Cluster Analysis. Global Social Policy, 10(1), 27-58, https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018109355035 Go to original source...
  2. Alesina, A., La Ferrara, E. (2005). Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5-6), 897-931, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.05.009 Go to original source...
  3. Antoąová, I. (2019). Does Extreme Poverty Occur in EU Countries? Scientific Papers, Series D, 27(3), 1-12.
  4. Anyanwu, J. C., Erhijakpor, A. E. O., Obi, E. (2016). Empirical Analysis of the Key Drivers of Income Inequality in West Africa. African Development Review, 28(1), 18-38, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12164 Go to original source...
  5. Arts, W., Gelissen, J. (2002). Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism or More? A State-of-the-art Report. Journal of European Social Policy, 12(2), 137-158, https://doi.org/10.1177/0952872002012002114 Go to original source...
  6. Balestra, C., Tonkin, R. (2018). Inequalities in household wealth across OECD countries: Evidence from the OECD Wealth Distribution Database. OECD. Working Paper No. 2018/01, https://doi.org/10.1787/18152031 Go to original source...
  7. Bambra, C. (2007). Defamilisation and welfare state regimes: a cluster analysis. International Journal of Social Welfare, 16(4), 326-338, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2007.00486.x Go to original source...
  8. Barro, R. J. (2000). Inequality and growth in a panel of countries. Journal of Economic Growth, 5(1), 5-32. Go to original source...
  9. Bauhr, M., Charron, N. (2019). The EU as a Savior and a Saint? Corruption and Public Support for Redistribution. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(4), 509-527, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1578816 Go to original source...
  10. Bénabou, R. (2000). Unequal Societies: Income Distribution and the Social Contract. American Economic Review, 90(1), 96-129, https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.1.96 Go to original source...
  11. Bénabou, R. (2002). Tax and Education Policy in a Heterogeneous-Agent Economy: What Levels of Redistribution Maximize Growth and Efficiency? Econometrica, 70(2), 481-517, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00293 Go to original source...
  12. Berg, A., Ostry, J. D., Tsangarides, C. G., et al. (2018). Redistribution, inequality, and growth: new evidence. Journal of Economic Growth, 23(3), 259-305, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-017-9150-2 Go to original source...
  13. Berg, A., Ostry, J. D., Zettelmeyer, J. (2012). What Makes Growth Sustained? Journal of Development Economics, 98(2), 149-166, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2011.08.002 Go to original source...
  14. Berg, A., Ostry, J. D. (2011). Inequality and Unsustainable Growth: Two Sides of the Same Coin? IMF Staff Discussion Note 11/08. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2011/sdn1108.pdf Go to original source...
  15. Bertin, G., Carradore, M. (2015). Differentiation of welfare regimes: The case of Italy. Journal of Social Welfare, 25(2), 149-160, https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12183 Go to original source...
  16. Bleaney, M., Gemmell, N., Kneller, R. (2001). Testing the Endogenous Growth Model: Public Expenditure, Taxation, and Growth Over the Long-Run. Canadian Journal of Economics, 34(1), 36-57, https://doi.org/10.1111/0008-4085.00061 Go to original source...
  17. Bohle D., Greskovits, B. (2007). Neoliberalism, embedded neoliberalism and neocorporatism: Towards transnational capitalism in central-eastern Europe. West European Politics, 30(3), 443-466, https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701276287 Go to original source...
  18. Bonoli, G. (1997). Classifying Welfare States: a Two-dimension Approach. Journal of Social Policy, 26(3), 351-372, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279497005059 Go to original source...
  19. Castelló-Climent, A. (2010). Inequality and growth in advanced economies: an empirical investigation. Journal of Economic Inequality, 8(3), 293-321, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-010-9133-4 Go to original source...
  20. Charron, N., Bauhr, M. (2020). Do Citizens Support EU Cohesion Policy? Measuring European support for redistribution within the EU and its correlates. Journal of Regional Research, 46, 11-26. ISSN 1695-7253. Go to original source...
  21. Claus, I., Martinez-Vazquez, J., Vulovic, V. (2012). Government Fiscal Policies and Redistribution in Asian Countries. Asia Development Bank, No. 310, Publication Stock No. WPS124966. ISSN 1655-5252. Go to original source...
  22. Easterly, W. (2007). Inequality Does Cause Underdevelopment: Insights from a New Instrument. Journal of Development Economics, 84(2), 755-776, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.11.002 Go to original source...
  23. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Go to original source...
  24. Fenger, H. J. M. (2007). Welfare regimes in Central and Eastern Europe: Incorporating post-communist countries in a welfare regime typology. Contemporary Issues and Ideas in Social Sciences, 3(2), 1-30.
  25. Ferreira, L. V., Figueiredo, A. (2005). Welfare Regimes in the EU 15 and in the Enlarged Europe - an Exploratory Analysis, 45th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: Land Use and Water Management in a Sustainable Network Society.
  26. Ferrera, M. (1996). The Southern Model of Welfare in Social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17-37, https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879600600102 Go to original source...
  27. Fiµo, P., Buchtová, B. (2010). The Relationship Between Unemployment Duration and Selected Personality Characteristic of Unemployed People. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 58(6), 123-132, https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201058060123 Go to original source...
  28. Forbes, K. J. (2000). A reassessment of the relationship between inequality and growth. The American Economic Review, 90(4), 869-887, https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.4.869 Go to original source...
  29. Goodin, R. E., Heady, B., Muffels, R., et al. (1999). The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-05-1149-092-7. Go to original source...
  30. Gough, I. (2001). Social Assistance Regimes: A Cluster Analysis. Journal of European Social Policy, 11(2), 165-170, https://doi.org/10.1177/095892870101100205 Go to original source...
  31. Halter, D., Oechslin, M., Zweimüller, J. (2014). Inequality and growth: the neglected time dimension. Journal of Economic Growth, 19(1), 81-104, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-013-9099-8 Go to original source...
  32. Isakjee, A. (2017). Welfare state regimes: a Literature Review. IRiS Working Paper Series, No. 18/2017. Available at: https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-social-sciences/social-policy/iris/2017/IRiS-WP-18-2017UPWEB18.pdf
  33. Izák, V. (2011). The Welfare State and Economic Growth. Prague Economic Papers, 20(4), 291-308, https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.401 Go to original source...
  34. Kammer, A., Niehues, J., Peichl, A. (2012). Welfare regimes and welfare state outcomes in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy. 22(5), 455-471. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928712456572 Go to original source...
  35. Kangas, O. E. (1994). The Politics of Social Security: On Regressions, Qualitative Comparisons, and Cluster Analysis. In: Janoski, T. and Hicks, A. M. (eds.). The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174053.015 Go to original source...
  36. Kohler, P. (2015). Redistributive Policies for Sustainable Development: Looking at the Role of Assets and Equity. DESA Working Paper No. 139 ST/ESA/2015/DWP/139. Available at: https://www.un.org/fr/desa/redistributive-policies-sustainable- development-looking-role-assets-and-equity
  37. Korpi, W., Palme, J. (1998). The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality, and Poverty in the Western Countries. American Sociological Review, 63(5), 661-687, https://doi.org/10.2307/2657333 Go to original source...
  38. Kráµ, P., Kanderová, M., Kaąčáková, A., et al. (2009). Viacrozmerné ątatistické metódy so zameraním na rieąenie problémov ekonomickej praxe. Banská Bystrica: Univerzita Mateja Bela, Ekonomická fakulta v Banskej Bystrici. ISBN 978-80-8083-840-9.
  39. Krasota, O., Melnyk, T. (2020). Social Inclusion as an Instrument for Reducing Socio-Economic Inequality. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D, 28(3), 1192, https://doi.org/10.46585/sp28031192 Go to original source...
  40. Leibfried, S. (1992). Towards a European welfare state? On Integrating Poverty Regimes into the European Community. In: Ferge, Z. and Kolberg, J. E. (eds.). Social Policy in a Changing Europe. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag. ISBN 978-02-0341-586-3.
  41. Lendvai, N. (2009). Variety of Post-communist welfare: Europeanisation and emerging welfare regimes in the New EU Member States. Paper for the RC-19 Montreal. Available at: http://cccg.umontreal.ca/RC19/PDF/Lendvai-N_Rc192009.pdf
  42. Li, H., Zou, H. (1998). Income inequality is not harmful for growth: Theory and evidence. Review of Development Economics, 2(3), 318-334, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9361 .00045 Go to original source...
  43. Macleod, D. (1993). Telecommunications Engineer's Reference Book. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN 978-14-831-9379-3. Go to original source...
  44. Medveď, J., Nemec, J., et al. (2011). Verejné financie. Bratislava: Sprint. ISBN 978-80-89393-46-6.
  45. Mkandawire, T. (2020). Colonial Legacies and Social Welfare Regimes in Africa: An Empirical Exercise. In: Hujo, K. (eds.). The Politics of Domestic Resource Mobilization for Social Development. Social Policy in a Development Context. London: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37595-9_5 Go to original source...
  46. Ng, A. (2012). Clustering with the k-means algorithm. Machine Learning.
  47. Obinger, H., Wagschal, U. (1998). Das Stratifizierungskonzept in der Clusteranalytischen Überprüfung. In: Lessenich, S., Ostner, I. (eds.). Welten des Wohlfahrtskapitalismus: Der Sozialstaat in vergleichender Perspektive, 109-135. Frankfurt am Main: Campus. ISBN 978-3-593-35966-3.
  48. Ostry, J. D., Berg, A., Tsangarides Ch. G. (2014). Redistribution, Inequality, and Growth. IMF Staff Discussion Note 14/02. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2014/sdn1402.pdf Go to original source...
  49. Persson, T., Tabellini, G. (1994). Is Inequality Harmful for Growth? The American Economic Review, 84(3), 600-621, https://doi.org/10.3386/w3599 Go to original source...
  50. Pitruzello, S. (1999). Decommodification and the worlds of welfare capitalism: a cluster analysis. Florence. European University Institute, 16(1), 73-80, https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928706059835 Go to original source...
  51. Rousseeuw, P. J. (1987). Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of computational and applied mathematics, 20, 53-65, https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7 Go to original source...
  52. Powell, M. A., Barrientos, A. (2004). Welfare Regimes and The Welfare Mix. European Journal of Political Research, 43(1), 83-105, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00146.x Go to original source...
  53. Saint-Arnaud, S., Bernard, P. (2003). Convergence or Resilience? A Hierarchical Cluster Analysis of the Welfare Regimes in Advanced Countries. Current Sociology, 51(5), 499-527. https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921030515004 Go to original source...
  54. Shalev, M. (1996). The Privatization of Social Policy? Occupational Welfare and the Welfare State in America, Scandinavia and Japan. London: Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-312-16437-9
  55. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., Fittoussi, J. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Eurostat. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/8131721/8131772/Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi-Commission-report.pdf
  56. Tibshirani, R., Walther, G., Hastie, T. (2001). Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 63(2), 411-423, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00293 Go to original source...
  57. Vaąková, M., (2013). Redistribučná politika a príjmové nerovnosti v krajinách EÚ z pohµadu sociálnych reľimov. Almanach: Aktuálne otázky svetovej ekonomiky a politiky, 8(3), 202-219.
  58. Wildeboer Schut J. M., Vrooman, J. C., de Beer, P. T. (2001). On Worlds of Welfare. Institutions and their Effects in Eleven Welfare States. The Hague: Social and Cultural Planning Office of the Netherlands. ISBN 90-377-0049-7.
  59. Windmeijer, F. (2005). A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 126(1), 25-51, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.02.005 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.