Prague Economic Papers 2018, 27(6):723-742 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.682

A Financial Performance Comparison of Czech Credit Unions and European Cooperative Banks

Matěj Kuc1, Petr Teplý2
1 Charles University in Prague, Institute of Economic Studies, Czech Republic (matejkuc@seznam.cz)
2 Faculty of Finance and Accounting, University of Economics, Czech Republic (petr.teply@vse.cz)

This paper empirically assesses the financial performance of Czech credit unions in relation to other European cooperative banks in terms of their profitability and stability. We created a unique dataset of 283 cooperative banks from 15 European countries in the period 2006-2013. Using the system GMM and alternative panel data methods, we reveal worse performance of Czech credit unions in terms of both profitability and stability compared to their European peers. We also argue that big credit unions in the Czech Republic have assumed a non-sustainable business model depending on excessive risk taking while enjoying implicit subsidy via deposit insurance. In conclusion, we argue that under recent capital management policies, big Czech credit unions will likely face serious financial problems in coming years.

Keywords: credit union, cooperative banking, moral hazard, system GMM, Z-Score
JEL classification: C23, G21, L25

Accepted: April 23, 2018; Published: December 1, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kuc, M., & Teplý, P. (2018). A Financial Performance Comparison of Czech Credit Unions and European Cooperative Banks. Prague Economic Papers, 27(6), 723-742. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.682
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Arellano, M., Bover, O. (1995). Another Look at the Instrumental Variables Estimation of Error-components model. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-51, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-d Go to original source...
    2. Athanasoglou, P. et al. (2008). Bank-specific, Industry-specific and Macroeconomic Determinants of Bank Profitability. Journal of international financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 18(2), 121-136, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2006.07.001 Go to original source...
    3. Ayadi et al. (2010). Investigating Diversity in the Banking Sector in Europe - Key Developments, Performance and Role of Cooperative Banks. Brussels: CEPS. Go to original source...
    4. Beck, T. et al. (2009). Bank Ownership and Stability: Evidence from Germany. WP, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    5. Beckmann, R. (2007). Profitability of Western European Banking Systems: Panel Evidence on Structural and Cyclical Determinants. Deutsche Bundesbank. Discussion Paper No. 2007/17, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1090570 Go to original source...
    6. Blundell, R., Bond, S. (1998). Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143, https://doi.org/10.1920/wp.ifs.1995.9517 Go to original source...
    7. Bond, S. (2002). Dynamic Panel Models: A Guide to Micro Data Methods and Practice. Institute for Fiscal Studies. UCL, WP No. CWPO9/02, https://doi.org/10.1920/wp.cem.2002.0902 Go to original source...
    8. Cameron A. C., Miller, D. L. (2015). A Practitioner's Guide to Cluster Robust Inference. The Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 317-372, https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.317 Go to original source...
    9. ČNB (2014). Financial Market Supervision Report 2014. Prague: Czech National Bank.
    10. Delis, M. D., Kouretas, G. P. (2011). Interest Rates and Bank Risk-Taking. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(4), 840-855, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.09.032 Go to original source...
    11. Dvořák, P. (2004). Analýza příčin krize českého družstevního bankovnictví. Analýza příčin a důsledků české finanční krize v 90. letech, Prague: VŠE, pp. 93-100.
    12. García-Herrero, A. et al. (2009). What Explains the Low Profitability of Chinese Banks? Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(11), 2080-2092, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.05.005 Go to original source...
    13. Goddard, J. et al. (2004). The Profitability of European Banks: a Cross-sectional and Dynamic Panel Data Analysis. The Manchester School, 72(3), 363-381, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.2004.00397.x Go to original source...
    14. Goddard, J. et al. (2010). Do Bank Profits Converge? European Financial Management, 19(2), 345-365, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036x.2010.00578.x Go to original source...
    15. Hesse, H., Čihák, M. (2007). Cooperative Banks and Financial Stability. International Monetary Fund. Washington D. C. WP, No. 07/02, https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451865660.001 Go to original source...
    16. Iannotta, G. et al. (2006). Ownership Structure, Risk and Performance in the European Banking Industry. Journal of Banking and Finance, 31(7), 2127-2149, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.07.013 Go to original source...
    17. IMF (2012). Selected Issues on the Credit Union Sector - Technical Note. Washington D.C.: IMF.
    18. Köhler, M. (2012). Which Banks Are More Risky? The Impact of Loan Growth and Business Model on Bank Risk-taking. No. 33/2012, Deutsche Bundesbank. Go to original source...
    19. Lepetit, L., Strobel, F. (2013). Bank Insolvency Risk and Time-varying Z-score Measures. Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money, 25, 73-87, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2013.01.004 Go to original source...
    20. Liikanen, E. et al. (2012). High-level Expert Group on Reforming the Structure of the EU Banking Sector. Brussels: European Commission.
    21. Liu, H. et al. (2013). Competition and Stability in European Banking: a Regional Analysis. The Manchester School, 81(2), 176-201, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.2011.02285.x Go to original source...
    22. Matejašák, M., Teplý, P. (2013). Kampeličky jako dynamit na českém trhu? Český finanční a účetní časopis, 8(1), 33-47, https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cfuc.331 Go to original source...
    23. MFČR (2014). Závěrečná zpráva o hodnocení dopadů zákona, kterým se mění zákon č. 87/1995 Sb. Prague: MFČR.
    24. Moulton, B. R. (1986). Random Group Effects and the Precision of Regression Estimates. Journal of Econometrics, 32(3), 385-397, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90021-7 Go to original source...
    25. Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects. Econometrica, 49(6), 1417-1426, https://doi.org/10.2307/1911408 Go to original source...
    26. Shehzad, Ch. T. et al. (2009). Growth and Earnings Persistence in Banking Firms: A Dynamic Panel Investigation. CESifo Group Munich. WP No. 2772.
    27. Šútorová, B., Teplý, P. (2013). The Impact of Basel III on Lending Rates of EU Banks. Czech Journal of Finance, 63(3), 226-243.
    28. Šútorová, B., Teplý, P. (2014). The Level of Capital and the Value of EU Banks under Basel III. Prague Economic Papers, 23(2), 143-161, https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.477 Go to original source...
    29. Tomšík, V. (2015). Rozlišujeme meze družstevnictvím a bankovnictvím. Bankovnictví, 1. Prague.
    30. Windmeijer, F. (2005). A Finite Sample Correction for the Variance of Linear Efficient Two-step GMM Estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 126(1), 25-51, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.02.005 Go to original source...
    31. WOCCU (2011). Model Law for Credit Unions. World Council of Credit Unions.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content