Prague Economic Papers 2018, 27(1):3-20 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.645

Determinants of Bank Fee Income in the EU Banking Industry - Does Market Concentration Matter?

Karolína Vozková1, Petr Teplý2
1 Institute of Economic Studies, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic
2 Faculty of Finance and Accounting, University of Economics, Czech Republic

In this paper, we analyse the key determinants of bank fee and commission income in the European Union with a special emphasis on market concentration. On a sample of 258 EU banks during the 2007–2014 period, we apply System Generalized Method of Moments. First, we argue that the banks facing higher competition tend to expand more aggressively into non-traditional activities, and therefore they report a higher share of fee income in total income. Second, we found that a higher equity to assets ratio is related with higher shares of fee income since the bank needs more capital to prevent or manage the potential risks of the non-traditional activities. Finally, a high deposits to assets ratio tends to increase the fee income share, which may be possibly attributed to relatively high switching costs and to close depositor-bank relationship in the EU banks.

Klíčová slova: bank, fee and commission income, Generalized Method of Moments, Herfindahl index, market concentration
JEL classification: C23, G21, L25

Zveřejněno: 1. únor 2018  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vozková, K., & Teplý, P. (2018). Determinants of Bank Fee Income in the EU Banking Industry - Does Market Concentration Matter? Prague Economic Papers27(1), 3-20. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.645
Stáhnout citaci

Reference

  1. Arellano, M., Bond, S. (1991).Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297, https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  2. Bailey-Tapper, S.A. (2010). Non-Interest Income, Financial Performance & the Macroeconomy: Evidence on Jamaican Panel Data. Central Bank of Barbados. Working Paper. [online]. Available at: http://www.centralbank.org.bb/WEBCBB.nsf/vwPublications/45A844B4FDBD8CBC04257B0F00725528/$FILE/Non-interest%20Income%20Financial%20Performance%20%20the%20Macroeconomy_S%20Bailey-Tapper.pdf[Accessed25.1.2016].
  3. Blundell, R., Bond, S. (1998). Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4076(98)00009-8 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  4. Bond, S. (2002). Dynamic Panel Data Models: A Guide to Micro Data Methods and Practice. Cemmap. Working Paper CWP09/02. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  5. Busch, R., Kick, T. (2015). Income Structure and Bank Business Models: Evidence on Performance and Stability from the German Banking Industry. Schmalenbach Business Review, 67(1), 226-253. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  6. Craigwell, R., Maxwell, C. (2005). Non-Interest Income and Financial Performance at Commercial Banks in the Caribbean. Central Bank of Barbados. Working Paper,[online]. Available at: http://www.ccmf-uwi.org/files/publications/conference/898.pdf [Accessed 4.2.2015].
  7. Davis, P. E., Tuori, K. (2000). The Changing Structure of Banks' Income - An Empirical Investigation. Department of Economics and Finance Research Papers, Brunel University.
  8. De Young, R., Hunter, W.C. (2003). Deregulation, the Internet, and the Competitive Viability of Large Banks and Community Banks. The Future of Banking, ed. Benton Gup, Westport, CT, Quorum Books, 173-202.
  9. De Young, R., Hunter, W. C., Udell, G. F. (2004). Whither the Community Bank? What We Know and What We Suspect. Journal of Financial Services Research, 25, 81-94. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  10. De Young, R., Rice, T. (2004a). Non-Interest Income and Financial Performance at U.S. Commercial Banks. The Financial Review, 39(1), 101-127 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0732-8516.2004.00069.x Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  11. De Young, R., Rice, T. (2004b). How Do Banks Make Money? The Fallacies of Fee Income. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Economic Perspectives, 34-51.
  12. ECB (2000). EU Banks' Income Structure. [online]. Available at http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/eubkincen.pdf [Accessed 14.2.2015]. ECB FSR (2013).
  13. Financial Stability Review, November 2013. [online]. Available at http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/financialstabilityreview201311en.pdf?7bec0dd1be03f8af0020c3c258b053d0[Accessed4.12.2015].
  14. Firth, M., Li, W., Wang, S. S. (2013). The Growth, Determinants, and Profitability of Non-Traditional Activities of Chinese Banks. The European Journal of Finance, 22(4-6), 259-287, [online], https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847x.2013.791632 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  15. Fišerová, T., Teplý, P., Tripe, D. (2015). The Performance of Foreign-Owned Banks in Host Country Economies. Prague Economic Papers, 24(5), 538-561, https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.527 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  16. Gambacorta, L., van Rixtel, A. (2013). Structural Bank Regulation Initiatives: Approaches and Implications. BIS. Working Papers No 412, Monetary and Economic Department.
  17. Gürbüz, A. O., Yanik S., Aytürk Y. (2013). Income Diversification and Bank Performance: Evidence from Turkish Banking Sector. Journal of BRSA Banking and Financial Markets, 7(1), 9-29.
  18. Hahm, J. H. (2008). Determinants and Consequences of Non-Interest Income Diversification of Commercial Banks in OECD Countries. Journal of International Economic Studies, 12(1). Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  19. Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W., Rosen, H. S. (1988). Estimating Vector Autoregression with Panel Data. Econometrica, 56(6), 1371-1395, https://doi.org/10.2307/1913103 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  20. Kim, J. G., Kim Y. J. (2010). Non-Interest Income and Financial Performance at South Korea Banks [online].Available at: http://www.apeaweb.org/confer/hk10/papers/kim_jingun.pdf[Accessed 4.2.2015].
  21. Lepetit, L., Nys, E., Rous, P., Tarazi, A. (2005). Product Diversification in the European Banking Industry: Risk and Loan Pricing Implications. Working Paper series [online]. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=873490, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.873490[Accessed1.2.2015]. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  22. Moshirian, F., Sahgal, S., Zhang, B. (2011). Non-Interest Income and Systematic Risk: The Role of Concentration. Australian School of Business, University of New South Wales [online]. Available at: http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/conference/2011/global_sys_risk/Non-interest_income_and_systemic_risk.pdf[Accessed 4.2.2014].
  23. Neven, D., von Ungern-Sternberg, T. (1998). The Competitive Impact of the UBS-SBC Mergers. HEC University of Lausanne [online]. Available at http://www.hec.unil.ch/deep/textes/9805.pdf [Accessed 14.3.2015].
  24. Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects. Econometrica, 49(6), 1417-1426, https://doi.org/10.2307/1911408 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  25. Rogers, K., Sinkey, J. F. (1999). An Analysis of Nontraditional Activities at U.S. Commercial Banks. Review of Financial Economics, 8(1), 25-39 https://doi.org/10.1016/s1058-3300(99)00005-1 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  26. Roodman, D. (2006). How to do Xtabond2: An Introduction to "Difference" and "System" GMM in Stata. Centre for Global Development. Working Paper No. 103, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.982943 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  27. Růžičková, K., Teplý, P. (2015). Determinants of Banking Fee Income in the EU Banking Industry - Does Market Concentration Matter? IES FSV, Charles University. IES Working Paper 4/2015.
  28. Sanya, S., Wolfe, S. (2011). Can Banks in Emerging Economies Benefit from Revenue Diversification? Journal of Financial Services Research, 40(1-2), 79-101, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-010-0098-z Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  29. Shahida, S., Abd. Ghafar, I., Sanep, A. (2006). A Panel Data Analysis of Fee Income Activities in Islamic Banks. Islamic Economy, 19(2), 23-35, https://doi.org/10.4197/islec.19-2.2 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  30. Stiroh, K. J. (2002). Diversification in Banking Is Non-Interest Income the Answer? Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 36(5), 853-882, https://doi.org/10.1353/mcb.2004.0076 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  31. Stiroh, K. J. (2004). Do Community Banks Benefit from Diversification? Journal of Financial Services Research, 25(2-3), 135-160, https://doi.org/10.1023/b:fina.0000020657.59334.76 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  32. Windmeijer, F. (2005). A Finite Sample Correction for the Variance of Linear Efficient Two-Step GMM Estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 126(1), 25-51 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.02.005 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  33. Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  34. data.worldbank.org
  35. epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu
  36. sdw.ecb.europa.eu
  37. www.helgilibrary.com
  38. www.imf.org

Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), která umožňuje nekomerční distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.