Prague Economic Papers 2017, 26(1):3-18 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.593

The Impacts of Common Commercial Policy on Export Performances of Visegrad Countries

Tinatin Akhvlediani1, Katarzyna ¦ledziewska2
1 Digital Economy Lab., University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland (t.akhvlediani@delab.uw.edu.pl)
2 Faculty of Economic Sciences, Digital Economy Lab., University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland (k.sledziewska@uw.edu.pl)

The paper aims to investigate the impact of Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs) and common commercial policy (CCP) on export performances of Visegrad group of countries (The Visegrad Four, V-4: Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary) preceding and following the EU accession. The V-4, before becoming the EU members, have participated actively in regionalism, signing free trade agreements and customs unions which often also resulted in the extended economic integration. But since the EU accession in 2004, all RTAs of the new members were no longer valid as these countries became the parties of the CCP of the EU. To analyse whether CCP was beneficial on the export performances of the V-4 countries, we estimate the augmented gravity model by employing Poisson pseudo-maximum-likelihood (PPML) estimator for time periods before and after the EU accession, in 1999-2003 and 2004-2013, respectively.

Keywords: regional trade agreements, gravity model, Visegrad group
JEL classification: F14, F15, F55

Prepublished online: July 13, 2016; Published: February 1, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Akhvlediani, T., & ¦ledziewska, K. (2017). The Impacts of Common Commercial Policy on Export Performances of Visegrad Countries. Prague Economic Papers, 26(1), 3-18. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.593
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Acharya, R., Crawford, J. A., Maliszewska, M., Renard, C. (2011). Landscape, in Chauffour, J. P., Maur, J. C., eds., Preferential Trade Agreement Policies for Development: a Handbook. Washington DC: The World Bank. Go to original source...
    2. Baier, S. L., Bergstrand, J. H. (2009). Estimating the Effects of Free Trade Agreements on International Trade Flows Using Matching Econometrics. Journal of International Economics, 77(1), 63-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.09.006. Go to original source...
    3. Brodzicki, T. (2009). Extended Gravity Panel Data Model of Polish Foreign Trade. The Univeristy of Gdansk, Faculty of Economics, Economics of European Integration Division Working Paper No. 0901.
    4. Brodzicki, T. (2011). Structural Adjustments in Trade Relations of the Visegrad Group Countries. Proceedings of the thirteen annual conference, ETSG.
    5. Carrere, C. (2006). Revisiting the Effects of Regional Trade Agreements on Trade Flows with Proper Specification of the Gravity Model. European Economic Review, 50(2), 223-247. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.06.001. Go to original source...
    6. Cheong, J., Kwak, D. W., Tang, K. (2015). Heterogeneous Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements: How Does Partner Similarity Matter? World Development, 66, 222-236. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.08.021. Go to original source...
    7. Foster, N. (2012). On the Volume and Variety of Intra-Bloc Trade in an Expanded European Union. Workshop on "Revival in the 'Visegrad Countries' Mutual Trade after their EU Accession: A Search for an Explanation". Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, Monthly Report 8-9, 1-6.
    8. Ghosh, S., Yamarik, S. (2004). Does Trade Creation Measure up? A Reexamination of the Effects of Regional Trading Arrangements. Economics Letters, 82(2), 213-219. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2003.06.001. Go to original source...
    9. Hornok, C. (2010). Trade Enhancing EU Enlargement and the Resurgence of East-East Trade. Focus on European Economic Integration, Austrian National Bank, Vienna, 79-94.
    10. Hunya, G., Richter, S. (2011). Mutual Trade and Investment of the Visegrad Countries before and after Their EU Accession. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 2(2), 77-91.
    11. Janda, K. (2014). Export Credit Agencies in the Czech Republic and Their Market Power. CESifo Forum, Ifo Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, 15(3), 45-51.
    12. Janda, K., Michalíková, E., Psenakova, L. (2013). The Performance of Export Credit Agencies in Post-Communist Central European Countries. IES Working Paper No. 10/2013.
    13. Janda, K., Michalikova, E., Skuhrovec, J. (2013). Credit Support for Export: Robust Evidence from the Czech Republic. The World Economy, 36(12), 1588-1610. DOI: 10.1111/twec.12061. Go to original source...
    14. Magee, C. (2008). New Measures of Trade Creation and Trade Diversion. Journal of International Economics, 75(2), 340-362. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.03.006. Go to original source...
    15. Silva, J. M. C. S., Tenreyro, S. (2006). The Log of Gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 641-658. DOI: 10.1162/rest.88.4.641. Go to original source...
    16. Soloaga, I., Winters, L. A. (2001). Regionalism in the Nineties: What Effect on Trade? The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 12(1), 1-29. DOI: 10.1016/s1062-9408(01)00042-0. Go to original source...
    17. Tinbergen, J. (1962). Shaping the World Economy Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content