Prague Economic Papers 2024, 33(6):764-800 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.882

IPO Listing Review and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from the Sci-Tech Innovation Board in China

Xiaohong Yua, Maonan Chen ORCID...a, Yujun Wu ORCID...a, Dinglun Wangb
a School of Economics and Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, China
b School of Business, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

IPO listing review via comment letters is an important mechanism to improve the quality of listed firms, while its impact on corporate post-listing behaviors is not clear. Using China's Sci-Tech Innovation Board (STAR market) listed firms, this paper examines the impact of IPO listing review on corporate post-listing tax avoidance behavior. The empirical tests show that the increase of listing review intensity is significantly associated with lower corporate tax avoidance activities of firms after listing. Using textual analysis methods and mediating analysis, this study finds that the decrease effect of listing review on corporate tax avoidance activities is mainly associated with comment letter questions that monitor the characteristics of R&D activities and compliance with operations and information disclosure. The empirical findings support the "Bonding Hypothesis" about the IPO listing review. Further research shows that for non-state-owned firms, firms with low institutional investors shareholding, and firms listed through profitability-related listing criteria, their post-listing tax avoidance activities are more affected by the listing review intensity. Overall, the empirical findings of this study empirically support to the claim that the interactions between stock exchange and equity issuing firms via comment letters during the IPO process play a significant role in monitoring corporate posting-listing behavior. This study helps to reveal the actual effect and strong transmission between the exchange-led IPO listing review and corporate post-listing behaviors, and expands research findings on tax avoidance as well as the effectiveness of IPO comment letters.

Keywords: comment letters, corporate tax avoidance, IPO listing review; textual analysis, continuous difference in difference model
JEL classification: B23, C51

Received: July 9, 2024; Revised: November 18, 2024; Accepted: November 21, 2024; Published: December 30, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Yu, X., Chen, M., Wu, Y., & Wang, D. (2024). IPO Listing Review and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from the Sci-Tech Innovation Board in China. Prague Economic Papers, 33(6), 764-800. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.882
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Aboody, D., Lev, B. (2000). Information Asymmetry, R&D, and Insider Gains. The Journal of Finance, 55(6), 2747-2766. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00305 Go to original source...
    2. Alm, J., Torgler, B. (2011). Do Ethics Matter? Tax Compliance and Morality. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 635-651. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0761-9 Go to original source...
    3. Beck, T., Levine, R., Levkov, A. (2010). Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States. The Journal of Finance, 65(5), 1637-1667. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01589.x Go to original source...
    4. Bonsall IV, S. B., Koharki, K., Watson, L. (2017). Deciphering Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Credit Rating Disagreements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(2), 818-848. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12287 Go to original source...
    5. Boone, J. P., Linthicum, C. L., Poe, A. (2013). Characteristics of Accounting Standards and SEC Review Comments. Accounting Horizons, 27(4), 711-736. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-50551 Go to original source...
    6. Bozanic, Z., Dietrich, J. R., Johnson, B. A. (2017). SEC Comment Letters and Firm Disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 36(5), 337-357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2017.07.004 Go to original source...
    7. Cassell, C. A., Dreher, L. M., Myers, L. A. (2013). Reviewing the SEC's Review Process: 10-K Comment Letters and the Cost of Remediation. The Accounting Review, 88(6), 1875-1908. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50538 Go to original source...
    8. Chan, K. H., Luo, R., Mo, P. L. L. (2016). Auditors' Constraining Effect on Tax Noncompliance at Different Book-tax Conformity Levels in a Transition Economy. Journal of International Accounting Research, 15(3), 1-30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-51612 Go to original source...
    9. Chen, H., Tang, S., Wu, D., Yang, D. (2021). The Political Dynamics of Corporate Tax Avoidance: The Chinese Experience. The Accounting Review, 96(5), 157-180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2017-0601 Go to original source...
    10. Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., Shevlin, T. (2010). Are Family Firms More Tax Aggressive than non-Family Firms? Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), 41-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.02.003 Go to original source...
    11. Chen, S. S., Ho, K. Y., Ho, P. H. (2014). CEO Overconfidence and Long-term Performance Following R&D Increases. Financial Management, 43(2), 245-269. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/fima.12035 Go to original source...
    12. Chen, Y., Fan, Z., Gu, X., Zhou, L.-A. (2020). Arrival of Young Talent: The Send-down Movement and Rural Education in China. American Economic Review, 110(11), 3393-3430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20191414 Go to original source...
    13. Chung, R., Firth, M., Kim, J.-B. (2002). Institutional Monitoring and Opportunistic Earnings Management. Journal of Corporate Finance, 8(1), 29-48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/s0929-1199(01)00039-6 Go to original source...
    14. Cunningham, L. M., Johnson, B. A., Johnson, E. S., Lisic, L. L. (2020). The Switch-up: An Examination of Changes in Earnings Management after Receiving SEC Comment Letters. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(2), 917-944. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12546 Go to original source...
    15. Demsetz, H. (1964). The Exchange and Enforcement of Property Rights. The Journal of Law and Economics, 7, 11-26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/466596 Go to original source...
    16. Desai, M. A., Dharmapala, D. (2006). Corporate Tax Avoidance and High-powered Incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(1), 145-179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.02.002 Go to original source...
    17. Ettredge, M., Johnstone, K., Stone, M., Wang, Q. (2011). The Effects of Firm Size, Corporate Governance Quality, and Bad News on Disclosure Compliance. Review of Accounting Studies, 16, 866-889. Go to original source...
    18. Fang, V. W., Huang, A. H., Wang, W. (2017). Imperfect Accounting and Reporting Bias. Journal of Accounting Research, 55(4), 919-962. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12170 Go to original source...
    19. Fischer, P. E., Verrecchia, R. E. (2000). Reporting Bias. The Accounting Review, 75(2), 229-245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.126369 Go to original source...
    20. Gallemore, J., Labro, E. (2015). The Importance of the Internal Information Environment for Tax Avoidance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1), 149-167. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.005 Go to original source...
    21. Garg, M. (2018). The Effect of Internal Control Certification Regulatory Changes on Real and Accrual-based earnings Management. European Accounting Review, 27(5), 817-844. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2018.1454336 Go to original source...
    22. Gietzmann, M., Marra, A., Pettinicchio, A. (2016). Comment Letter Frequency and CFO Turnover: A Dynamic Survival Analysis. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 31(1), 79-99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558x15579493 Go to original source...
    23. Gietzmann, M. B., Isidro, H. (2013). Institutional Investors' Reaction to SEC Concerns about IFRS and US GAAP Reporting. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 40(7-8), 796-841. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12027 Go to original source...
    24. Gietzmann, M. B., Pettinicchio, A. K. (2014). External Auditor Reassessment of Client Business Risk Following the Issuance of a Comment Letter by the SEC. European Accounting Review, 23(1), 57-85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2013.774703 Go to original source...
    25. Graham, J. R., Hanlon, M., Shevlin, T., Shroff, N. (2014). Incentives for Tax Planning and Avoidance: Evidence from the Field. The Accounting Review, 89(3), 991-1023. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50678 Go to original source...
    26. Graham, J. R., Tucker, A. L. (2006). Tax Shelters and Corporate Debt Policy. Journal of Financial Economics, 81(3), 563-594. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.09.002 Go to original source...
    27. Griffith, R., Sandler, D., Van Reenen, J. (1995). Tax Incentives for R&D. Fiscal Studies, 16(2), 21-44, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.1995.tb00220.x Go to original source...
    28. Gu, Z., Li, Z., Yang, Y. G. (2013). Monitors or Predators: The Influence of Institutional Investors on Sell-side Analysts. The Accounting Review, 88(1), 137-169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50263 Go to original source...
    29. Hanlon, M., Krishnan, G. V., Mills, L. F. (2012). Audit Fees and Book-tax Differences. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 34(1), 55-86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/atax-10184 Go to original source...
    30. Hasan, I., Hoi, C. K. S., Wu, Q., Zhang, H. (2014). Beauty is in the Eye of the Beholder: The Effect of Corporate Tax Avoidance on the Cost of Bank Loans. Journal of Financial Economics. 113(1), 109-130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.03.004 Go to original source...
    31. Heese, J., Khan, M., Ramanna, K. (2017). Is the SEC Captured? Evidence from Comment-letter Reviews. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 64(1), 98-122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2017.06.002 Go to original source...
    32. Himmelberg, C. P., Petersen, B. C. (1994). R & D and Internal Finance: A Panel Study of Small Firms in High-tech Industries. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 38-51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2109824 Go to original source...
    33. Johnston, R., Petacchi, R. (2017). Regulatory Oversight of Financial Reporting: Securities and Exchange Commission Comment Letters. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(2), 1128-1155. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12297 Go to original source...
    34. Jones, S. L., Megginson, W. L., Nash, R. C., Netter, J. M. (1999). Share Issue Privatizations as Financial Means to Political and Economic Ends. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(2), 217-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-405x(99)00021-5 Go to original source...
    35. Kim, J.-B., Li, Y., Zhang, L. (2011). Corporate Tax Avoidance and Stock Price Crash Risk: Firm-Level Analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(3), 639-662. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.07.007 Go to original source...
    36. Law, K. K., Mills, L. F. (2015). Taxes and Financial Constraints: Evidence from Linguistic Cues. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(4), 777-819. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12081 Go to original source...
    37. Levy, D. M., Terleckyj, N. E. (1983). Effects of Government R&D on Private R&D Investment and Productivity: A Macroeconomic Analysis. The Bell Journal of Economics, 551-561. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3003656 Go to original source...
    38. Li, B., Liu, Z. (2017). The Oversight Role of Regulators: Evidence from SEC Comment Letters in the IPO Process. Review of Accounting Studies, 22, 1229-1260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-017-9406-2 Go to original source...
    39. Li, Z., Li, X., Xie, A. (2020). Independent Technical Directors and their Effect on Corporate Innovation in China. China Journal of Accounting Research, 13(2), 175-199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2020.06.001 Go to original source...
    40. Lowry, M., Michaely, R., Volkova, E. (2020). Information Revealed through the Regulatory Process: Interactions between the SEC and Companies ahead of Their IPO. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(12), 5510-5554. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa007 Go to original source...
    41. Magnis, C., Iatridis, G. E. (2017). The Relation between Auditor Reputation, Earnings and Capital Management in the Banking Sector: An International Investigation. Research in International Business and Finance, 39, 338-357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.09.006 Go to original source...
    42. Merkley, K. J. (2014). Narrative Disclosure and Earnings Performance: Evidence from R&D Disclosures. The Accounting Review, 89(2), 725-757. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50649 Go to original source...
    43. Nunn, N., Qian, N. (2011). The Potato's Contribution to Population and Urbanization: Evidence from a Historical Experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(2), 593-650. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr009 Go to original source...
    44. Paligorova, T., Xu, Z. (2012). Complex Ownership and Capital Structure. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(4), 701-716. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2012.05.001 Go to original source...
    45. Qian, N. (2008). Missing Women and the Price of Tea in China: The Effect of Sex-Specific Earnings on Sex Imbalance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(3), 1251-1285. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2008.123.3.1251 Go to original source...
    46. Rego, S. O., Wilson, R. (2012). Equity Risk Incentives and Corporate Tax Aggressiveness. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(3), 775-810. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2012.00438.x Go to original source...
    47. Schuldt, M., Vega, J. (2018). An Examination of SEC Revenue Recognition Comments and IPO Earnings Management. Accounting Research Journal, 31(3), 371-387. https://doi.org/10.1108/arj-11-2015-0135 Go to original source...
    48. Tassey, G. (1996). Choosing Government R&D Policies: Tax Incentives vs. Direct Funding. Review of Industrial Organization, 11, 579-600. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00214824 Go to original source...
    49. Warren III, M. G. (1987). Legitimacy in the Securities Industry: The Role of Merit Regulation. Brook. L. Rev., 53, 129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1621814 Go to original source...
    50. Wilson, R. J. (2009). An Examination of Corporate Tax Shelter Participants. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 969-999. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.969 Go to original source...
    51. Zhang, M., Lijun, M., Zhang, B., Yi, Z. (2016). Pyramidal Structure, Political Intervention and Firms' Tax Burden: Evidence from China's local SOEs. Journal of Corporate Finance, 36, 15-25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.10.004 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content