Prague Economic Papers 2024, 33(2):164-186 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.855

Contribution of EU Cohesion Policy to Regional Growth: Evidence from V4 Countries*

Martin Maris ORCID...
Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of European Studies and Regional Development, Nitra, Slovakia

The EU Cohesion Policy is one of the European Union’s key policy instruments for reducing economic and social disparities among its regions. The paper evaluates the policy contribution to regional economic growth in V4 (Visegrad Four) countries. The study establishes a significant variation in ESIF (European Structural and Investment Funds) distribution at the NUTS2 (Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics) level within the V4 regions over 2000–2018. It suggests that ESIF absorption was not evenly distributed across regions within the V4 countries. This finding indicates that regional disparities in ESIF distribution may have contributed to economic imbalances within the countries. Secondly, a causal link between regional growth and ESIF absorption is identified. Along with other covariates, the use of the ESIF shows a statistically significant, although very modest, effect on the economic growth of V4 countries. Finally, the assumption of cross-country growth dispersion is investigated. The research results suggest statistically significant regional growth differences between Czechia and Slovakia on the one hand and Poland and Hungary on the other. It implies that the impact of ESIF absorption on economic growth may have varied among these V4 countries, potentially due to differences in policy implementation, economic structures or other factors.

Keywords: EU Cohesion Policy, economic growth, ESIF, V4 countries
JEL classification: E61, R11

Received: September 5, 2023; Revised: December 7, 2023; Accepted: December 28, 2023; Published: May 3, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Maris, M. (2024). Contribution of EU Cohesion Policy to Regional Growth: Evidence from V4 Countries*. Prague Economic Papers, 33(2), 164-186. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.855
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Aghion, P., Durlauf, S. (2005). Handbook of Economic Growth. Elsevier. ISBN 97800880461137. Go to original source...
    2. Arellano, M. (1987). Computing Standard Errors for Robust Within-groups Estimators. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1987.mp49004006.x Go to original source...
    3. Bachtler, J., Begg, I., Polverari, L. (2013). Evaluation of the Main Achievements of Cohesion Policy Programmes and Projects over the Longer Term in 15 Selected Regions. Final Report to the European Commission (DG REGIO). University of Strathclyde.
    4. Bachtler, J., Wren, C. (2007). Evaluation of European Cohesion Policy: Research Questions amid Policy Challenges. Regional Studies, 40(2), 143-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400600600454 Go to original source...
    5. Baláž, V., Karasová, K., Williams, M. A. (2017). The V4 Countries and the EU: A Comparative Perspective in Fish, S. et al., A Quarter Century of Post-Communism. Assessed Palgrawe Macmillan. ISBN 978-3-319-43436-0. Go to original source...
    6. Barca, F. (2009). An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. A Place-based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations. University of Strathclyde.
    7. Bartkiewitz, P., Cukrowska, E., Gebska, J., Regulski, A., Zawistowski, J., Zub, M. (2011). Evaluation of Benefits to the EU-15 Countries Resulting from the Implementation of the Cohesion Policy in the Visegrad Group Countries. IBS: Warsaw.
    8. Boldrin, M., Canova, F. (2001). Inequality and Convergence in Europe's Regions: Reconsidering European Regional Policies. Economic Policy, 16, 207-253. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0327.00074 Go to original source...
    9. Bouvet, F., Dall'erba, S. (2010). European Regional Structural Funds: How Large is the Influence of Politics on the Allocation Process? Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(3), 501-528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02062.x Go to original source...
    10. Brown, A., Fornoni, R., Gardiner, B., Greunz, L., Jestl, S., Rabemfiara, N., Römisch, R., Stenning, J., Ward, T. (2017). Economic Challenge of Lagging Regions, Luxembourg.
    11. Butkus, M., Cibuslkiene, D., Maciulyte-Sniukiene, A., Matuzeviciute, K. (2020). Non-linear and Lagging Convergence Effects of the EU's Regional Support at NUTS 3 Level. Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis, 12(1), 35-51. https://doi.org/10.37043/JURA.2020.12.1.3 Go to original source...
    12. Cabada, L., Waisová, Š. (2018). The Visegrad Group as an Ambitious Actor of (Central-)European Foreign and Security Policy. Politics in Central Europe, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2018-0006 Go to original source...
    13. Cappello, R., Cerisola, S. (2020). Concentrated Versus Diffused Growth Assets: Agglomeration Economies and Regional Cohesion. Growth and Change: A Journal of Urban and Regional Policy, 51, 1440-1453. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12419 Go to original source...
    14. Crescenzi, R., Guia, M. (2018). One or Many Cohesion Policies of the European Union? On the Differential Economic Impacts of Cohesion Policy Across Member States. Regional Studies, 54(1), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1665174 Go to original source...
    15. Crescenzi, R. (2009). Undermining the Principle of Concentration? European Union Regional Policy and the Socio-economic Disadvantage of European Regions. Regional Studies, 43(1), 111-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400801932276 Go to original source...
    16. Dall'erba, S., Gallo, L. J. (2008). Regional Convergence and the Impact of European Structural Funds over 1989-1999: A Spatial Econometric Analysis. Papers in Regional Science, 87(2), 219-244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2008.00184.x Go to original source...
    17. Dorozynski, T., Kuna-Marszalek, A. (2016). Investment Attractiveness. The Case of the Visegrad Group Countries. Comparative Economic Research, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2016-0007 Go to original source...
    18. Dotti, F. N. (2012). The Unbearable Instability of Structural Funds Distribution. European Planning Studies, 21(4), 596-614. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722956 Go to original source...
    19. Eckey, F. H., Türck, M. (2007). Convergence of EU Regions. A Literature Report. Vorlkswirtschaftliche Diskussionbeinträge, No. 80. Universität Kassel.
    20. Ederveen, S., De Groot, L. F. H., Nahuis, R. (2003). Fertile Soil for Structural Funds? A Panel Data Analysis of the Conditional Effectiveness of European Cohesion Policy. Tinbergen Institute Working Paper No. 2002-096/3. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.338060 Go to original source...
    21. European Commission. (2021). Cohesion in Europe towards 2050: Eight Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion. Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
    22. Ministry of Economic Development of Poland. (2017). Impacts and Results of Cohesion Policy. Benefits from V4 Cohesion Policy to the EU-15 and Projects Examples from V4.
    23. Eurostat. (2022). Historic EU Payments by MS & NUTS-2 region. European Structural and Investment Funds.
    24. Farole, T., Rodriguez-Pose, A., Storper, M. (2011). Cohesion Policy in the European Union: Growth, Geography, Institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02161.x Go to original source...
    25. Fiaschi, D. Lavezzi, M. A., Parenti, A. (2017). Does EU Cohesion Policy Work? Theory and Evidence. Journal of Regional Science, 58(2), 386-423. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12364 Go to original source...
    26. Ferrara, A. R., McCann, P., Pellegrini, G., Stelder, D., Terribile, F. (2017). Assessing the Impacts of Cohesion Policy on EU Regions: A Non-parametric Analysis on Interventions Promoting Research and Innovation and Transport Accessibility. Papers in Regional Science, 96(4), 817-841. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12234 Go to original source...
    27. Florio, M., Moretta, V., Willak, W. (2018). Cost-Benefit Analysis and European Union Cohesion Policy: Economic Versus Financial Returns in Investment Project Appraisal. Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis, 9(1), 147-180. https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2018.4 Go to original source...
    28. Fratesi, U., Wishlade, F. G. (2017). The Impact of European Cohesion Policy in Different Context. Regional Studies, 51(6), 817-821. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1326673 Go to original source...
    29. Gagliardi, L., Percoco, M. (2016). The Impact of European Cohesion Policy in Urban and Rural Regions. Regional Studies, 51(6), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1179384 Go to original source...
    30. Geppert, K. Stephan, A. (2008). Regional Disparities in the European Union: Convergence and Agglomeration. Papers in Regional Science, 87(2), 193-217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00161.x Go to original source...
    31. Hansen, B. (2022). Econometrics. Princeton University Press.
    32. Hansen, B. C. (2007). Asymptotic Properties of a Robust Variance Matrix Estimator for Panel Data When T is Large. Journal of Econometrics, 141(2), 597-620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.10.009 Go to original source...
    33. Hudcovský, M., Lábaj, M., Morvay, K. (2017). Employment Growth and Labor Elasticity in V4 Countries: Structural Decomposition Analysis. Prague Economic Papers, 26(4), 422-437. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.623 Go to original source...
    34. Kemmerling, A., Bodenstein, T. (2006). Partisan Politics in Regional Redistribution: Do Parties Affect the Distribution of EU Structural Funds across Regions? European Union Politics, 7(3), 373-392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116506066264 Go to original source...
    35. Kořan, M. (2017). Central Europe: The Death of Dreams? Think Visegrad Policy Brief.
    36. Kuzelewska, E., Bartnicki, R., Skarzyński, A. (2015). Origins of and Perspectives for the Future for the Visegrad Group. Ten Years of the Visegrad Group Member States in The European Union. Warsaw-Bialystok. ISBN 978-83-7545-583-0.
    37. Landesmann, M. A., Römisch, R. (2006). Economic Growth, Regional Disparities and Employment in the EU-27. Wiiw Research Report, No.33.
    38. Leonardi, R. (2005). Cohesion Policy in the European Union. The Building of Europe. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-4039-4955-4. Go to original source...
    39. Martin, P. (2005). The Geography of Inequalities in Europe. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 12:83-108.
    40. Medve-Bálint, G. (2016). Funds for the Wealthy and the Politically Loyal? How EU Funds May Contribute to Increasing Regional Disparities in East Central Europe.1st Edition. Routledge. ISBN-9781315401867.
    41. Mellors, C., Copperthwaite, N. (1990). Regional Policy. Routledge: London. ISBN 0-415-03828-6.
    42. Molle, W. (2007). European Cohesion Policy. Routledge: London. ISBN 978-0-415-43811-7. Go to original source...
    43. Nežinský, E., Fifeková, E. (2014). The V4: A Decade after the EU Entry. Entrepreneurial Business and Economic Review, 2(2), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2014.020204 Go to original source...
    44. Nič, M. (2016). The Visegrád Group in the EU: 2016 as a Turning-point? European View, 15, 281-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-016-0422-6 Go to original source...
    45. Paľová, D., Vejačka, M. (2018). Analysis of Employment in the EU According to Europe 2020 Strategy Targets. Economics & Sociology, 11(3), 96-112. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-3/6 Go to original source...
    46. Pastor, J., Pons, E., Serrano, L. (2010). Regional Inequality in Spain: Permanent Income versus Current Income. The Annals of Regional Science, 44(1), 121-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0236-9 Go to original source...
    47. Pieńkowski, J., Berkowitz, P. (2015). Econometric Assessments of Cohesion Policy Growth Effects: How to Make Them More Relevant for Policy Makers? Working Papers. Regional and Urban Policy
    48. Pellegrini, G., Terribile, F., Tarola, O., Muccigrosso, T., Bussilo, F. (2013). Measuring the Effects of European Regional Policy on Economic Growth: A Regression Discontinuity Approach. Papers in Regional Science, 92(1), 217-233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2012.00459.x Go to original source...
    49. Percoco, M. (2017). Impact of European Cohesion Policy on Regional Growth: Does Local Economic Structure Matter? Regional Studies, 51(6), 833-843. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1213382 Go to original source...
    50. Petrakos, G., Rodriguez-Pose, A., Rovolis, A. (2005). Growth, Integration, and Regional Disparities in the European Union. Environment and Planning, 37, 1837-1855. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37348 Go to original source...
    51. Puga, D. (2002). European Regional Policies in Light of Recent Location Theories. Journal of Economic Geography, 2(4), 373-406. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/2.4.373 Go to original source...
    52. Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A. (2021). Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. Fourth Edition. Volume I: Continuous Responses. StataCorp LLC.
    53. Raisová, M., Ďurčová, J. (2014). Economic Growth - Supply and Demand Perspective. Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, 184-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00476-6 Go to original source...
    54. Rodriguez-Pose, A., Gill, N. (2004). Is There a Global Link Between Regional Disparities and Devolution Environment and Planning, 36(12), 2097-2117. https://doi.org/10.1068/a362 Go to original source...
    55. Schwarcz, P., Takáč, I., Kováčik, M. (2019). Kohézna Politika. Vydavateľstvo SPU v Nitre. ISBN 978-80-5522123-6.
    56. Wong, S. W. D., Lee, J. (2005). Statistical Analysis of Geographic Information. John Wiley & Sons. New Jersey.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content