Prague Economic Papers 2023, 32(6):628-658 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.848

Does Urban Greening Construction Promote Technological Innovation of Enterprises? Evidence from China

Yongxiang Jiao, Fen Xu ORCID..., Hongen Yang
School of Economics, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing, China

Based on data for cities and enterprises in China from 2009 to 2020, we examine the effect of urban greening construction on corporate technological innovation. Urban greening con-struction has a pronounced promoting effect on the technological innovation of enterprises, which is more significant among enterprises in the Eastern Region, enterprises in heavily polluting industries and state-owned enterprises. However, urban greening construction only has a significant promoting effect on enterprise invention and green patent applications and has no significant promoting effect on utility models and design patent applications. In addition, urban greening construction mainly enhances enterprise technological innovation by strengthening enterprise environmental responsibility undertaking, enhancing urban human capital density, and improving urban air quality. Promoting the urban marketability process can significantly enhance the role of urban greening construction in enterprise technological innovation.

Keywords: urban greening construction, enterprise technological innovation, green patent, air pollution, human capital, environmental responsibility, marketability, JEL Codes: D22, R50
JEL classification: D22, R50

Received: March 22, 2023; Revised: September 6, 2023; Accepted: September 15, 2023; Published: December 19, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Jiao, Y., Xu, F., & Yang, H. (2023). Does Urban Greening Construction Promote Technological Innovation of Enterprises? Evidence from China. Prague Economic Papers32(6), 628-658. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.848
Download citation

References

  1. Albrizio, S., Kozluk, T., Zipperer, V. (2017). Environmental Policies and Productivity Growth: Evidence across Industries and Firms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 81, 209-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2016.06.002 Go to original source...
  2. Azam, M., Khan, A. Q., Ozturk, I. (2019). The Effects of Energy on Investment, Human Health, Environment and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(11), 10816-10825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04497-4 Go to original source...
  3. Baron, R. M., Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6). https://doi.org/1173.10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 Go to original source...
  4. Cai, X., Lu, Y., Wu, M., Yu, L. (2016). Does Environmental Regulation Drive away Inbound Foreign Direct Investment? Evidence from a Quasi-natural Experiment in China. Journal of Development Economics, 123, 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2016.08.003 Go to original source...
  5. Carlino, G., Kerr, W. R. (2015). Agglomeration and Innovation. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 5, 349-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59517-1.00006-4 Go to original source...
  6. Carrión-Flores, C. E., Innes, R. (2010). Environmental Innovation and Environmental Performance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 59(1), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2009.05.003 Go to original source...
  7. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Ali, S. S. (2015). Exploring the Relationship between Leadership, Operational Practices, Institutional Pressures and Environmental Performance: A Framework for Green Supply Chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 160, 120-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.10.001 Go to original source...
  8. Fan, G., Ma, G., Wang, X. (2019). Institutional Reform and Economic Growth of China: 40-year Progress Toward Marketization. Acta Oeconomica, 69(s1), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2019.69.s1.2 Go to original source...
  9. Feng, S., Zhang, R., Li. G. (2022). Environmental Decentralization, Digital Finance and Green Technology Innovation. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 61, 70-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2022.02.008 Go to original source...
  10. Franco, C., Marin, G. (2017). The Effect of Within-sector, Upstream and Downstream Environmental Taxes on Innovation and Productivity. Environmental and Resource Economics, 66(2), 261-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-015-9948-3 Go to original source...
  11. Ghanem, D., Zhang, J. (2014). Effortless Perfection: Do Chinese Cities Manipulate Air Pollution Data? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 68(2), 203-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2014.05.003 Go to original source...
  12. Grossman, M. (1972). On the Concept of Health Capital and the Demand for Health. Journal of Political Economy, 80(2), 223-255. https://doi.org/10.1086/259880 Go to original source...
  13. Hart, S. L., Ahuja, G. (1996). Does It Pay to Be Green? An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Emission Reduction and Firm Performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0836(199603)5:13.0.co;2-q Go to original source...
  14. Hiemstra, J. A., Saaroni, H., Amorim, J. H. (2017). The Urban Heat Island: Thermal Comfort and the Role of Urban Greening. In The Urban Forest (pp. 7-19). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50280-9_2 Go to original source...
  15. Huihua, N., Li, J. (2013). Collusion and Economic Growth: A New Perspective on the China Model. Economic and Political Studies, 1(2), 18-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2013.11673858 Go to original source...
  16. Hunter, L. M., Simon, D. H. (2017). Might Climate Change the "Healthy Migrant" Effect? Global Environmental Change, 47, 133-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.10.003 Go to original source...
  17. Jiang, X., Fu, W., Li, G. (2020). Can the Improvement of Living Environment Stimulate Urban Innovation? Analysis of High-quality Innovative Talents and Foreign Direct Investment Spillover Effect Mechanism. Journal of Cleaner Production, 255, 120212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120212 Go to original source...
  18. Jiang, Z., Wang, Z., Zeng, Y. (2020). Can Voluntary Environmental Regulation Promote Corporate Technological Innovation? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 390-406. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2372 Go to original source...
  19. Jiao, Y., Xu, F., Ma, W., Yang, H. (2023). Can Urban Greening Construction Improve the Corporate Preventive Environmental Investment? Evidence from China. Sustainability, 15, 9326. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129326 Go to original source...
  20. Kekezi, O., Klaesson, J. (2020). Agglomeration and Innovation of Knowledge Intensive Business Services. Industry and Innovation, 27(5), 538-561. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2019.1573660 Go to original source...
  21. Kim, Y., Brodhag, C., Mebratu, D. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility Driven Innovation. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 27(2), 175-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2014.915191 Go to original source...
  22. Lai, H., Wang, F., Guo, C. (2022). Can Environmental Awards Stimulate Corporate Green Technology Innovation? Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(10), 14856-14870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16632-1 Go to original source...
  23. Lao, X., Gu, H., Yu, H., Xiao, F. (2021). Exploring the Spatially-varying Effects of Human Capital on Urban Innovation in China. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 14(4), 827-848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-021-09380-9 Go to original source...
  24. Li, X., Guo, Y., Hou, J., et al. (2021). Human Capital Allocation and Enterprise Innovation Performance: an Example of China's Knowledge-intensive Service Industry. Research in International Business and Finance, 58, 101429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101429 Go to original source...
  25. Liu, S., Yang, Y., Cai, L. (2023). Impact of Air Quality on Enterprise Productivity: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1095393. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1095393 Go to original source...
  26. Liao, Z. (2018). Environmental Policy Instruments, Environmental Innovation and the Reputation of Enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 1111-1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.126 Go to original source...
  27. Lim, S., Prakash, A. (2014). Voluntary Regulations and Innovation: The Case of ISO 14001. Public Administration Review, 74(2), 233-244. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12189 Go to original source...
  28. Liotta, C., Kervinio, Y., Levrel, H., Tardieu, L. (2020). Planning for Environmental Justice-reducing Well-being Inequalities through Urban Greening. Environmental Science & Policy, 112, 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.03.017 Go to original source...
  29. Ma, X., Ock, Y. S., Wu, F., et al. (2017). The Effect of Internal Control on Green Innovation: Corporate Environmental Investment as a Mediator. Sustainability, 14(3), 17-55. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031755 Go to original source...
  30. Manderson, E., Kneller, R. (2012). Environmental Regulations, Outward FDI and Heterogeneous Firms: Are Countries Used as Pollution Havens? Environmental and Resource Economics, 51(3), 317-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9500-z Go to original source...
  31. Mori, J., Ferrini, F., Saebo, A. (2018). Air Pollution Mitigation by Urban Greening. Italus Hortus, 25(1), 13-22. http://doi.org/10.26353/j.itahort/2018.1.1322 Go to original source...
  32. Nastran, M., Kobal, M., Eler, K. (2019). Urban Heat Islands in Relation to Green Land Use in European Cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 37, 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.01.008 Go to original source...
  33. Nowak, D. J., Hirabayashi, S., Doyle, M., McGovern, M., Pasher, J. (2018). Air Pollution Removal by Urban Forests in Canada and its Effect on Air Quality and Human Health. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 29, 40-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.10.019 Go to original source...
  34. Oliva, F. L., Semensato, B. I., Prioste, D. B., Winandy, E. J. L., Bution, J. L., Couto, M. H. G., Bottacin, M. A., Mac Lennan, M. L. F., Teberga, P. M. F., Santos, R. F., Singh, S. K., da Silva, S. F., Massaini, S. A. (2019), Innovation in the Main Brazilian Business Sectors: Characteristics, Types and Comparison of Innovation, Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(1), 135-175. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2018-0159 Go to original source...
  35. Pang, Q. (2022). Study on the Threshold Effect of Environmental Tax on Green Innovation. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 4(1), 54-57. https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v4i1.502 Go to original source...
  36. Petroni, G., Bigliardi, B., Galati, F. (2019). Rethinking the Porter Hypothesis: the Underappreciated Importance of Value Appropriation and Pollution Intensity. Review of Policy Research, 36(1), 121-140. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12317 Go to original source...
  37. Porter, M. E., Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a New Conception of the Environment-competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97 Go to original source...
  38. Ramanathan, R., He, Q., Black, A., Ghobadian, A., Gallear, D. (2017). Environmental Regulations, Innovation and Firm Performance: A Revisit of the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155, 79-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.116 Go to original source...
  39. Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002-1037. https://doi.org/10.1086/261420 Go to original source...
  40. Santos-Jaén, J. M., Madrid-Guijarro, A., García-Pérez-de-Lema, D. (2021). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Innovation in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: The Mediating Role of Debt Terms and Human Capital. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(4), 1200-1215. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2125 Go to original source...
  41. Shi, H., Yan, G., Cai, Q., et al. (2023). Corporate Social responsibility, Strategic style and Enterprise Innovation: Evidence from China. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istra¾ivanja, 36(2), 2142808. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2022.2142808 Go to original source...
  42. Shen, N., Liao, H., Deng, R., Wang, Q. (2019). Different Types of Environmental Regulations and the Heterogeneous Influence on the Environmental Total Factor Productivity: Empirical Analysis of China's Industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 171-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.170 Go to original source...
  43. Song, Y., Yang, T., Zhang, M. (2019). Research on the Impact of Environmental Regulation on Enterprise Technology Innovation-an Empirical Analysis Based on Chinese Provincial Panel Data. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(21), 21835-21848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05532-0 Go to original source...
  44. Sun, Z., Wang, X., Liang, C., Cao, F., Wang, L. (2021). The Impact of Heterogeneous Environmental Regulation on Innovation of High-tech Enterprises in China: Mediating and Interaction Effect. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(7), 8323-8336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11225-w Go to original source...
  45. Wang, H., Zhang, R. (2022). Effects of Environmental Regulation on CO2 Emissions: An Empirical Analysis of 282 Cities in China. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 29, 259-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.10.016 Go to original source...
  46. Wang, Z., Li, X., Xue, X., Liu, Y. (2022). More Government Subsidies, More Green Innovation? The Evidence from Chinese New Energy Vehicle Enterprises. Renewable Energy, 197, 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.086 Go to original source...
  47. Zhong, Z., Peng, B. (2022). Can Environmental Regulation Promote Green Innovation in Heavily Polluting Enterprises? Empirical Evidence from a Quasi-natural Experiment in China. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 30, 815-828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.01.017 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.