Prague Economic Papers 2023, 32(3):246-272 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.831

How Tax Wedge of Low and Upper-income Households Affects Income Distribution: Findings from OECD Countries

Emin Efecan Aktaº ORCID...a
a Department of Accounting and Tax Practices, Kirsehir Ahi Evran University, Kirsehir, Türkiye

The tax wedge mainly quantifies the extent to which tax on labour income enervates employment and it reflects the total labour costs. It is commonly defined as the ratio between the amount of taxes paid by the worker and the related total labour costs for the employer. As such, the tax wedge affects both the labour force (unemployment) by reflecting the burden of the employer and indirectly the household disposable income. It is conferred that the alteration caused by the tax wedge on income distribution has been analysed with a small number of empirical studies. Based on the hypothesis that the tax wedge may affect income distribution from different aspects in terms of household size and income level, dynamic panel data analysis is carried out for 36 OECD member countries and the period 2000-2019. The dynamic panel analysis estimation findings for two households (single person with no children, earning 167% of the average wage, and one-earner married couple with two children, earning 100% of average wages) reveal that the tax wedge is negatively related to unfair income distribution. In addition, the aspect of the relationship is the same (negative) for the two households.

Keywords: Income distribution; tax wedge; labour; generalized method of moments
JEL classification: H24, J21, J82, O15

Received: November 9, 2022; Revised: March 4, 2023; Accepted: March 14, 2023; Published: June 28, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Efecan Aktaº, E. (2023). How Tax Wedge of Low and Upper-income Households Affects Income Distribution: Findings from OECD Countries. Prague Economic Papers32(3), 246-272. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.831
Download citation

References

  1. Akay, E. Ç. (2018). Stata ve Panel Modellerinin Tahmini. In S. Güriº (Ed.), Uygulamali panel veri ekonometrisi (pp. 106-130). İstanbul: Der Yayinlari.
  2. Akgün, O., Cournède, B., Fournier, J. M. (2017). The effects of the tax mix on inequality and growth. OECD Economics Department Working Papers (Working Paper No. 1447).
  3. Arellano, M., Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968 Go to original source...
  4. Arellano, M., Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D Go to original source...
  5. Atkinson, A. B. (1970). On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 2(3), 244-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(70)90039-6 Go to original source...
  6. Atkinson, A. (1980). Horizontal Inequity and the Distribution of the Tax Burden. In H. Aaron and M. Boskin (Ed.), The economics of taxation (pp. 3-18). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  7. Attinasi, M. G., Berardini, F., De Stefani, R., Osterloh, S. (2016). The effects of labor income taxes on labor market performance: An empirical analysis. Draft Working Paper.
  8. Auerbach, A. J., Feenberg, D. (2000). The significance of federal taxes as automatic stabilizers. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Papers (Working Paper No. 7662).
  9. Ay, H., Haydanli, M. L., (2018). Kuruluºundan günümüze Türkiye'de vergi yükü ve gelir dağiliminin analizi. Sosyoekonomi, 26(38), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2018.04.04 Go to original source...
  10. Bachmann, R., Bechara, P., Schaffner, S. (2012). Wage inequality and wage mobility in Europe. Leibniz Information Centre for Economics Ruhr Economic Papers (Paper No. 386).
  11. Behar, A. (2009). Tax wedges, unemployment benefits and labour market outcomes in the new EU members. Czech Economic Review, 3(1), 69-92.
  12. Blakey, R. (1938). Personal income taxation. American Political Science Review, 32(3), 557-559. https://doi.org/10.2307/1949140 Go to original source...
  13. Blundell, R., Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8 Go to original source...
  14. Bond, S. (2002). Dynamic panel models: A guide to micro data methods and practice. University College London The Institute for Fiscal Studies Department of Economics, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice (Working Paper No. CWPO9/02). Go to original source...
  15. Breitung, J. (1997). Testing for unit roots in panel data using a GMM approach. Statistical Papers, 38(3), 253-269. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02925268 Go to original source...
  16. Breitung, J. (2000). The Local Power of Some Unit Root Tests for Panel Data. Advances in Econometrics, 15(1), 161-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15006-6 Go to original source...
  17. Bükey, A. M., Çetin, B. I. (2017). Türkiye'de gelir dağilimina etki eden faktörlerin en küçük kareler yöntemi ile analizi. Maliye Araºtirmalari Dergisi, 3(3), 103-117.
  18. Blundell, R., Joyce, R., Keiller, A. N., Ziliak, J. P. (2018). Income inequality and the labor market in Britain and the US. Journal of Public Economics, 162(2018), 48-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.04.001 Go to original source...
  19. Burniaux, J. M., Padrini, F., Brandt, N. (2006). Labour market performance, income inequality and poverty in OECD countries. OECD Economics Department Working Papers (Working Paper No. 500).
  20. Calderón, C., Chong, A. (2009). Labor market institutions and income inequality: An empirical exploration. Public Choice, 138(1/2), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9339-1 Go to original source...
  21. Carrera, J. E., de la Vega, P. (2018). Does inequality affect investment in a nonlinear way? A cross country analysis. IV Jornada de Investigación en Ciencias Económicas Conference Paper. [Retrieved 2021-07-05] Available at: http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/110317
  22. Catalano, M., Pezzolla, E. (2015). The interaction between the labour tax wedge and structural reforms in Italy. Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, 0(5), 185-223. Go to original source...
  23. Checchi, D., Garcia-Penalosa, C. (2005). Labour market institutions and the personal distribution of income in the OECD. IZA Institute of Labor Economics Discussion Papers (Discussion Paper No. 1681). Go to original source...
  24. Checchi, D., Garcia-Penalosa, C. (2008). Labour market institutions and income inequality. Economic Policy, 23(56), 602-649. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0327.2008.00209.x Go to original source...
  25. Checchi, D., Garcia-Penalosa, C. (2010). Labour market institutions and the personal distribution of income in the OECD, Economica, 77(307), 413-450. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2009.00776.x Go to original source...
  26. Choi, I. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2), 249-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5606(00)00048-6 Go to original source...
  27. Clark, C. M. A., Kavanagh, C. (1996). Basic income, inequality, and unemployment: Rethinking the linkage between work and welfare. Journal of Economic Issues, 30(2), 399-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1996.11505803 Go to original source...
  28. Coenen G., McAdam, P., Straub, R. (2007). Tax reform and labor market performance in the euro area: A simulation-based analysis using the new area-wide model. European Central Bank Working Paper Series (Working Paper No. 747).
  29. Dalton, H. (1954). Principles of public finance. Fourth edition. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.
  30. Daudey, E., García-Peñalosa, C. (2007). The personal and the factor distributions of income in a cross section of countries. The Journal of Development Studies, 43(5), 812-819. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380701384406 Go to original source...
  31. Daveri, F., Tabellini, G. (2000). Unemployment, growth and taxation in industrial countries. Economic Policy, 15(30), 48-104. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.52787 Go to original source...
  32. de Groot, H. L. F., Tang, P. J. G., Nahuis, R. (2004). Is the American model miss world? Choosing between the Anglo-Saxon model and a European-style alternative. Utrecht University School of Economics Tjalling C. Koopmans Research Institute Discussion Paper Series (Paper No. 04-26).
  33. Ederveen, S., Thissen, L. (2004). Can labour market institutions explain unemployment rates in new EU member states? European Network of Economic Policy Research Institutes Working Papers (Working Paper No. 27).
  34. Edizdoğan, N., Çetinkaya, Ö., Gümüº, E. (2013). Kamu maliyesi. Bursa: Ekin Basim Yayin.
  35. Elwell, J, Corinth, J. K., Burkhauser, R. V. (2020). Income Growth and Its Distribution from Eisenhower to Obama: The Growing Importance of In-Kind Transfers (1959-2016). In D. Furchtgott-Roth (Ed.), United States income, wealth, consumption, and inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
  36. Erauskin, I. (2020). The labor share and income inequality: Some empirical evidence for the period 1990-2015. Applied Economic Analysis, 28(84), 173-195. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEA-04-2020-0028 Go to original source...
  37. Francese, M., Mulas-Granados, C. (2015). Functional income distribution and its role in explaining inequality. IMF Working Papers (Working Paper No. 15/244).
  38. Forbes, K. J. (2000). A reassessment of the relationship between inequality and growth. American Economic Review, 90(4), 869-897. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.4.869 Go to original source...
  39. Galor, O., Zeira, J. (1993). Income distribution and macroeconomics. The Review of Economic Studies, 608(1), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297811 Go to original source...
  40. Günel, T. (2020). The relation of tax wedge and unemployment in G-7 countries: Panel co-integration analysis. Vergi Raporu, 255(12), 78-90.
  41. Hayakawa, K. (2007). Small sample bias properties of the system gmm estimator in dynamic panel data models. Economics Letters, 95(1), 32-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECONLET.2006.09.011 Go to original source...
  42. Hodge, S. A., Hickman, B. (2018). The importance of the tax wedge on labor in evaluating tax systems. Available at: https://files.taxfoundation.org/20180913095728/Global-Primer_tax_wedge.pdf
  43. Hsiao, C. (2003). Analysis of panel data. Second Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0511754203 Go to original source...
  44. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7 Go to original source...
  45. Iosifidi, M., Mylonidis, N. (2017). Relative effective taxation and income inequality: Evidence from OECD countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 27(1), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928716672182 Go to original source...
  46. Jacobson, M., Occhino, F. (2012). Labor's declining share of income and rising inequality. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. Available at: https://www.clevelandfed.org/newsroom-and events/publications/economic-commentary/economic-commentary-archives/2012-economic commentaries/ec-201213-labors-declining-share-of-income-and-rising-inequality.aspx
  47. Jung, H., Kwon, H. U. (2007). An alternative system GMM estimation in dynamic panel models. Hitotsubashi University Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study Discussion Paper Series (Paper No. 217).
  48. Kakwani, N. C. (1977). Measurement of tax progressivity: An international comparison. Economic Journal, 87(345), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.2307/2231877 Go to original source...
  49. Kalyva, A., Princen, S., Leodolter, A., Astarita, C. (2018). Labour taxation and inclusive growth. European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs European Economy Discussion Papers (Paper No. 084).
  50. Karabarbounis, L., Neiman, B., Adams, J. (2014). Labor shares and income inequality. Society for Economic Dynamics Meeting Papers (Paper No. 539).
  51. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1-28.
  52. Madrick, J., Papanikolaou, N. (2010). The stagnation of male wages in the US. International Review of Applied Economics, 24(3), 309-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171003701495 Go to original source...
  53. Lambert, P. J. (2001). The distribution and redistribution of income. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  54. Levin, A., Lin, C.-F., Chu, C.-S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7 Go to original source...
  55. Li, H., Zou, H. F. (1998). Income inequality is not harmful for growth: Theory and evidence. Review of Development Economics, 2(3), 318-334. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9361.00045 Go to original source...
  56. Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The theory of public finance: A study in public economy. New York: McGraw Hill Book Co.
  57. Ochmann, R., Peichl, A. (2006). Measuring distributional effects of fiscal reforms. University of Cologne Institute for Public Economics FiFo Discussion Papers (Paper No. 06-9).
  58. OECD (2021a). Tax Wedge (indicator). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/cea9eba3-en Go to original source...
  59. OECD (2021b). Taxing Wages 2021. OECD Publishing, Paris. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/047072cd-en Go to original source...
  60. Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0900900106 Go to original source...
  61. Rossvoll, E. M., Sparrman, V. (2015). Labor market institutions and wage inequality in the OECD countries. Statistics Norway Research Department Discussion Papers (Paper No. 826).
  62. Sattarhoff, C. (2010). GMM estimation of multifractal random walks using an efficient algorithm for hac covariance matrix estimation. Leibniz Information Centre for Economics Ruhr Conference Papers (Paper No. A19-V3).
  63. Solt, F. (2020). Measuring income inequality across countries and over time: The standardized world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly, 101(3), 1183-1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12795 Go to original source...
  64. Soto, M. (2009). System gmm estimation with a small sample. Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC) Working Papers (Working Paper No. 780.09).
  65. Suits, D. B. (1977). Measurement of tax progressivity. The American Economic Review, 67(4), 747-752.
  66. Todoroviæ, J. Ğ., Ğorğeviæ, M., Ristiæ, M. (2018). The Tax wedge as the determinant of unemployment: A comparative overview of OECD countries and Serbia. Paper presented at the 49th International Scientific Conference Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis in Economics.
  67. Trpeski, P., Tashevska, B. (2012). Labour tax wedge in the republic of macedonia-trends and international comparison. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica Alba Iulia, 2(14), 1-24. Go to original source...
  68. Urban I., Èok, M., Verbiè, M. (2019). The burden of labour taxation in Croatia, Slovenia and Slovakia in the period 2011-2017. Economic Research, 32(1), 1430-1456. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1638291 Go to original source...
  69. Vanhoudt, P. (1997). Do labor market policies and growth fundamentals matter for income inequality in OECD countries?: Some empirical evidence. IMF Staff Papers, 44(3), 356-373. https://doi.org/10.2307/3867564 Go to original source...
  70. Verbeek, M. (2017). A Guide to modern econometrics. Fifth Edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  71. Verhoogen, E. A. (2008). Trade, equality upgrading and wage inequality in the Mexican manufacturing sector. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2), 489-530. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2008.123.2.489 Go to original source...
  72. Vickrey, W. (1947). Agenda for progressive taxation. American Political Science Review, 41(5), 1016-1017. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400260814 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.