Prague Economic Papers 2022, 31(5):398-416
Do R&D Subsidies Improve Operational Performance? New evidence from China
- a School of Economics, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing, China
- b Institute of New Commercial Economy, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing, China
- c School of Foreign Languages, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing, China
- d School of Economics and Management, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China
The sustainable development of the digital economy has attracted wide attention. To ex-plore how to improve the operational performance of China's digital firms, this paper conducts an influence mechanism model to test the nonlinear effect, heterogeneity effects, and mediation effects using a panel data of China's digital firms from 2008 to 2017. The empirical results indicate that R&D subsidies have an inverted U-shaped effect on operational performance, and these results are still valid after a series of robustness tests. In addition, we find that R&D subsidies have a heterogeneous effect on operational performance in terms of region, company size, governance structure, and executive education background. Moreover, regarding the influence mechanism, R&D subsidies improve operational performance by improving innovation efficiency. This paper proposes some policy implications to improve the operational performance of China's digital firms.
JEL classification: D02, D04, L86
Received: February 15, 2022; Revised: May 23, 2022; Accepted: June 6, 2022; Published: December 5, 2022 Show citation
References
- Aaronson, S. A., Leblond, P. (2018). Another digital divide: The rise of data realms and its implications for the WTO. Journal of International Economic Law, 21(2), 245-272, https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgy019
Go to original source...
- Aerts, K., Schmidt, T. (2008). Two for the price of one? Additionality effects of R&D subsidies: A comparison between Flanders and Germany. ZEW - Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 06-063, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.931127
Go to original source...
- Angrist, J. D., Pischke, J. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-12035-5.
Go to original source...
- Arendt, L. (2015). The digital economy, ICT and economic growth in the CEE countries. Olsztyn Economic Journal, 10, 247-262, https://doi.org/10.31648/oej.3150
Go to original source...
- Baron, R. M., Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Go to original source...
- Bhagat, S., Bolton, B. (2019). Corporate governance and firm performance: The sequel. Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, 142-168, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.04.006
Go to original source...
- Bianchini, S., Llerena, P., Martino, R. (2019). The impact of R&D subsidies under different institutional frameworks. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 50, 65-78, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2019.04.002
Go to original source...
- Castellani, D., Piva, M., Schubert, T., et al. (2019). R&D and productivity in the US and the EU: Sectoral specificities and differences in the crisis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138, 279-291, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.001
Go to original source...
- Chen, Y. (2020). Improving market performance in the digital economy. China Economic Review, 62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101482
Go to original source...
- Chen, J., Heng, C. S., Tan, B. C., et al. (2018). The distinct signaling effects of R&D subsidy and non-R&D subsidy on IPO performance of IT entrepreneurial firms in China. Research Policy, 47(1), 108-120, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.10.004
Go to original source...
- Czarnitzki, D., Hottenrott, H. (2017). Inter-organizational collaboration and financing constraints for R&D. Economics Letters, 161, 15-18, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.09.008
Go to original source...
- Fogel, A. S., Kliment'yeva, S. V. (2021). Digital Economy: Challenges and Development Risks. In: Ashmarina, S. I., Mantulenko, V. V. (2021). Digital Technologies in the New Socio-Economic Reality. Berlin: Springer, 363-373, https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-030-83175-2_46
Go to original source...
- Goldfarb, A., Tucker, C. (2019). Digital economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 57(1), 3-43, https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20171452
Go to original source...
- Hanna, N. K. (2020). Assessing the digital economy: aims, frameworks, pilots, results, and lessons. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 1-16, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-020-00129-1
Go to original source...
- Iqbal, S., Nawaz, A., Ehsan, S. (2019). Financial performance and corporate governance in microfinance: Evidence from Asia. Journal of Asian Economics, 60, 1-13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2018.10.002
Go to original source...
- Liu, Y., Yang, Y., Li, H., et al. (2022). Digital economy development, industrial structure upgrading and green total factor productivity: Empirical evidence from China's cities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 2414, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042414
Go to original source...
- Luo, X., Huang, F., Tang, X., et al. (2021). Government subsidies and firm performance: Evidence from high-tech start-ups in China. Emerging Markets Review, 49, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100756
Go to original source...
- Miao, Z. (2021). Digital economy value chain: concept, model structure, and mechanism. Applied Economics, 53(37), 4342-4357, https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1899121
Go to original source...
- Minford, L., Meenagh, D. (2019). Testing a model of UK growth: A role for R&D subsidies. Economic Modelling, 82, 152-167, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.01.002
Go to original source...
- Myovella, G., Karacuka, M., Haucap, J. (2020). Digitalization and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Sub-Saharan Africa and OECD economies. Telecommunications Policy, 44(2), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101856
Go to original source...
- Nilsen, Ø. A., Raknerud, A., Iancu, D. C. (2018). Public R&D Support and Firms' Performance - A Panel Data Study. NHH Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper No. 13/2018, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205004
Go to original source...
- Noori, J., Nasrabadi, M. B., Yazdi, N., et al. (2017). Innovative performance of Iranian knowledge-based firms: Large firms or SMEs? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 122, 179-185, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.025
Go to original source...
- Popkova, E. G., Sergi, B. S. (2020). Digital economy: Complexity and variety vs. rationality. ISBN 978-3-030-29586-8.
Go to original source...
- Qian, F., Yuan, X. (2022). R&D subsidies, internet penetration and global value chain position. R&D Management, https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12532
Go to original source...
- Ren, S., Li, L., Han, Y., et al. (2022). The emerging driving force of inclusive green growth: Does digital economy agglomeration work? Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1656-1678, https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2975
Go to original source...
- Vanino, E., Roper, S., Becker, B. (2019). Knowledge to money: Assessing the business performance effects of publicly-funded R&D grants. Research Policy, 48(7), 1714-1737, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.001
Go to original source...
- Wang, M., Boateng, A., Hua, X. (2021). More money, more honey? An examination of additionality of China's government R&D subsidies. The European Journal of Finance, 1-26, https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2021.1918202
Go to original source...
- Yu, F., Wang, L., Li, X. (2020). The effects of government subsidies on new energy vehicle enterprises: The moderating role of intelligent transformation. Energy Policy, 141, 111463, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111463
Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.