Prague Economic Papers 2022, 31(5):377-397 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.817

Bitcoin Transaction Fees, Miners' Revenue, Concentration and Electricity Consumption: A Failing Ecosystem

Frederik Recha, Chen Yana, Amon Bagonza ORCID...a, Lubomir Pinter ORCID...b, Hussam Musab
a Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Department of Accounting, Dalian, China
b Matej Bel University, Faculty of Economics, Department of Finance and Accounting, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia

The research and investment community seems to ignore the long-term sustainability of Bitcoin, which is reflected in four flaws: transaction fees, miners' revenue, concentration and electricity consumption. While most of the authors have aimed to examine one topic at a time, with a particular interest in electricity consumption and carbon footprint, the aim of this paper is to examine all these issues simultaneously to provide a more comprehensive view on long-term sustainability of Bitcoin. This paper looks at these flaws and reveals why Bitcoin is not sustainable in the long run, how decentralization is being lost, how the design is putting artificial and unrealistic pressure on the ecosystem, while all being powered by an unjustifiable amount of dirty electricity sources. Our main findings are as follows. Firstly, transaction fees are already high and set to increase in time, further discriminating small transactions against big ones. Secondly, miners' revenue comes mostly from the block reward. The block reward is the main income source for miners, but is set to be cut on a regular basis, making miners' revenue not sustainable in the long run. Thirdly, miner concentration is already an issue, with a possibility of deepening even more and diminishing the idea of decentralization. Fourthly, the high electricity demand and the associated carbon footprint thus cannot be justified by any means. We deem our results useful for overall policy and regulatory implications.

Klíčová slova: Bitcoin, transaction fees, miners' revenue, miner concentration, Electricity consumption
JEL classification: E14, F39, G19

Vloženo: 18. listopad 2021; Revidováno: 7. červen 2022; Přijato: 15. září 2022; Zveřejněno: 5. prosinec 2022  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Rech, F., Yan, C., Bagonza, A., Pinter, L., & Musa, H. (2022). Bitcoin Transaction Fees, Miners' Revenue, Concentration and Electricity Consumption: A Failing Ecosystem. Prague Economic Papers, 31(5), 377-397. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.817
Stáhnout citaci
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Zobrazit celý článek

    Reference

    1. Auer, R. (2019). Beyond the Doomsday Economics of "Proof-of-Work" in Cryptocurrencies. Globalization Institute Working Paper 355, https://doi.org/10.24149/gwp355 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    2. Blandin, A., Pieters, G., Wu, Y., et al. (2020). 3rd Global Cryptoasset Benchmarking Study. Cambridge: Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, University of Cambridge: Judge Business School. Available at: https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/2021-ccaf-3rd-global-cryptoasset-benchmarking-study.pdf Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    3. Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, University of Cambridge: Judge Business School (2021). Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index (CBECI), Bitcoin Mining Map. [Retrieved 2022-03-02] Available at: https://cbeci.org/mining_map
    4. Corbet, S., Lucey, B., Yarovaya, L. (2021). Bitcoin-energy markets interrelationships - New evidence. Resources Policy, 70, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101916 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    5. Das, D., Dutta, A. (2019). Bitcoin's energy consumption: Is it the Achilles heel to miner's revenue? Economics Letters, 186, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2019.108530 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    6. De Vries, A. (2019). Renewable Energy Will Not Solve Bitcoin's Sustainability Problem. Joule, 3(4), 893-898, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.02.007 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    7. De Vries, A. (2020). Bitcoin's energy consumption is underestimated: A market dynamics approach. Energy Research and Social Science, 70, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101721 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    8. Di Febo, E., Ortolano, A., Foglia, M., et al. (2021). From Bitcoin to carbon allowances: An asymmetric extreme risk spillover. Journal of Environmental Management, 298, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113384 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    9. Easley, D., O'Hara, M., Basu, S. (2019). From mining to markets: The evolution of bitcoin transaction fees. Journal of Financial Economics, 134(1), 91-109, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.03.004 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    10. Elliott, F., Duncan, G. (2009). Chancellor Alistair Darling on brink of second bailout for banks. [Retrieved 2022-04-05] Avalaible at: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/chancellor-alistair-darling-on-brink-of-second-bailout-for-banks-n9l382mn62h
    11. Fantacci, L. (2019). Cryptocurrencies and the Denationalization of Money. International Journal of Political Economy, 48(2), https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2019.1624319 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    12. Huynh, A. N. Q., Duong, D., Burggraf, T., et al. (2022). Energy Consumption and Bitcoin Market. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 29, 79-93, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-021-09338-4 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    13. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Austin: Satoshi Nakamoto Institute. Available at: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
    14. Nakamoto, S. (2010). What's with this odd generation? Bitcoin Forum. [Retrieved 2022-04-05] Available at: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=48.msg329#msg329
    15. Polemis, M. L., Tsionas, M. G. (2021). The environmental consequences of blockchain technology: A Bayesian quantile cointegration analysis for Bitcoin. International Journal of Finance and Economics, https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2496 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    16. Rauchs, M., Blandin, A., Klein, K., et al. (2018). 2rd Global Cryptoasset Benchmarking Study. Cambridge: Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, University of Cambridge: Judge Business School. Available at: https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/faculty-research/centres/alternative-finance/publications/2nd-global-cryptoasset-benchmark-study/ Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    17. Stoll, C., Klaaßen, L., Gallersdö, U. (2019). The Carbon Footprint of Bitcoin. Joule, 3(7), 1647-1661, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.05.012 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    18. Truby, J. (2018). Decarbonizing Bitcoin: Law and policy choices for reducing the energy consumption of Blockchain technologies and digital currencies. Energy Research and Social Science, 44, 399-410, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.009 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    19. Tsang, K. P., Yang, Z. (2021). The market for bitcoin transactions. Journal of International Financial Markets, 71, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2021.101282 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    20. Xu, J., Wen, B,, Miao, H., et al. (2021). Bitcoin miners: Exploring a covert community in the Bitcoin ecosystem. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 14, 644-654, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-020-01021-1 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    21. MacLaurin W. R. The process of technological innovation: launching a new scientific industry[J]. The American Economic Review, 1950, (40)1:303-348.
    22. Meirun, T., Mihardjo, L. W., Haseeb, M., Khan, S. A. R., and Jermsittiparsert, K. (2021). The dynamics effect of green technology innovation on economic growth and CO 2 emission in Singapore: New evidence from bootstrap ARDL approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(4), 4184-4194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10760-w Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    23. Samad, G., and Manzoor, R. (2011). Green Growth: An Environmental Technology Approach. The Pakistan Development Review, 50(4), 471-490. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23617713 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    24. Shen, F., Liu, B., Luo, F., Wu, C., Chen, H., and Wei, W. The effect of economic growth target constraints on green technology innovation. J Environ Manage. 2021 Aug 15;292:112765. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112765. Epub 2021 May 20. PMID: 34022652. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    25. Shi, T., Yang, S., Zhang, W., and Zhou, Q. (2020). Coupling coordination degree measurement and spatiotemporal heterogeneity between economic development and ecological environment----Empirical evidence from tropical and subtropical regions of China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118739.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118739Sun Yuhong, and Zhang Chunxiao. The Review and Thinking of China's Green Technology Innovation in the past 40 years of reform and opening [J]. Guangdong Social Sciences, 2018 (05): 5-12. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    26. Tang, Z. (2015). An integrated approach to evaluating the coupling coordination between tourism and the environment. Tourism Management, 46, 11-19.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.06.001Tao Changqi, Li Cui, and Wang Xiahuan. The effect of environmental regulation on total factor energy efficiency and the evolution of energy consumption structureTao Feng, Zhao Jinyu, and Zhou Hao. Does environmental regulation achieve the "incremental quality improvement" of green technology innovation from the environmental target responsibility system [J]? China Industrial Economy, 2021 (02): 136-154. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    27. Tovar, B. and Rendeiro Martín-Cejas, R. Technical efficiency and productivity changes in Spanish airports: A parametric distance functions approach[J]. Transportation Research Part E Logistics & Transportation Review, 2010, 46(2):249-260.Wang Fayuan and Wang Zongshun. Green technology progress, financial input and high-quality economic development [J]. Statistics and Decision-making, 2021,37 (14): 109-112. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    28. Wang Hui, Wang Xiaoqiao, Miao Zhuang, and Li Xiaocong. Heogenous threshold effect of R & D investment on green innovation efficiency based on China's high-tech industry [J]. Scientific research management, 2016,37 (02): 63-71.
    29. Wang, Q., Qu, J., Wang, B., Wang, P., and Yang, T. (2019). Green technology innovation development in China from 1990 to 2015. Science of the Total Environment, 696, 134008.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134008 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    30. Wicki, S., and Hansen, E. G. (2019). Green technology innovation: Anatomy of exploration processes from a learning perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(6), 970-988.https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2295Xiao Liming, Gao Junfeng, Liu Shuai. Empirical Analysis of Interprovincial panel data based on spatial gradient [J]. Soft Science, 2017,31 (09): 63-68. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    31. Xing, L., Xue, M., and Hu, M. (2019). Dynamic simulation and assessment of the coupling coordination degree of the economy-resource-environment system: Case of Wuhan City in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 230, 474-487.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.065Yang Haochang, Li Lianshui, and Zhang Invention. High-tech industrial agglomeration and green technology innovation performance [J]. Research management, 2020,41 (09): 99-112. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    32. Zailani, S., Iranmanesh, M., Nikbin, D., and Jumadi, H. B. (2014). Determinants and environmental outcome of green technology innovation adoption in the transportation industry in Malaysia. Asian Journal of technology innovation, 22(2), 286- 301. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2014.973167Zhu Yuke, Gao Honggui, and Xiao Tian. Green technology innovation, industrial structure optimization and high-quality economic development of industrial enterprises [J]. Statistics and Decision-making, 2021,37 (19): 111-115. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    33. Zhuang Qinqin, Wu Bin, and Hong Qunlian. Market-oriented green technology innovation system: theoretical connotation, practical exploration and promotion strategy [J]. The Economist, 2020 (11): 29-38.

    Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), která umožňuje nekomerční distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.


    Zpět na obsah