Prague Economic Papers 2021, 30(1):3-19 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.757

ATP Identification Using Balance of Payments Data: Case of the Czech Republic

Jan Pavel ORCID...a, Jana Tepperová ORCID...a
a Prague University of Economics and Business, Prague, Czech Republic

Multinational enterprises apply aggressive tax planning (ATP) to optimize global tax liability usually by combining parameters of different tax systems in both national jurisdictions and double tax treaties. At a macroeconomic level, the implementation of various optimization schemes affects the given values of the balance of payments. By conducting econometric analysis, the present paper examines the extent to which selected optimization schemes can be traced in the Czech Republic's balance of payments. The results show that payments for counselling services and royalties flow mostly to locations with low corporate tax rates, which may suggest an attempt to shift the tax base. Moreover, dividend and interest yields tend to move to countries with high foreign direct investments (FDIs) and balanced ratios between FDIs received and made, indicating that they are only conduit (transit) countries through which profits are transferred to another destination.

Keywords: BEPS, balance of payments, corporate taxation, FDI, tax planning
JEL classification: E62, F23, H26

Received: September 9, 2019; Revised: May 3, 2020; Accepted: June 18, 2020; Prepublished online: September 9, 2020; Published: February 4, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pavel, J., & Tepperová, J. (2021). ATP Identification Using Balance of Payments Data: Case of the Czech Republic. Prague Economic Papers, 30(1), 3-19. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.757
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Bolwijn, R., Casella, B., Rigo, D. (2018). An FDI-driven Approach to Measuring the Scale and Economic Impact of BEPS. Transnational Corporations, 25(2), 107-143, https://doi.org/10.18356/c4f9fd3c-en Go to original source...
    2. Bradbury, D., Hanappi, T., Moore, A. (2018). Estimating the Fiscal Effects of Base Erosion and Profit Shifting: Data Availability and Analytical Issues. Transnational Corporations, 25(2), 91-106, https://doi.org/10.18356/e1d7a8b4-en Go to original source...
    3. Cobham, A., Janský, P. (2015). Measuring Misalignment: The Location of US Multinationals' Economic Activity versus the Location of Their Profits. ICTD. Working Paper No. 42, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3119824 Go to original source...
    4. Council of the EU (2003). Council Directive 2003/49/EC of 3 June 2003 on a Common System of Taxation Applicable to Interest and Royalty Payments Made between Associated Companies of Different Member States. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32003L0049&from=EN
    5. Council of the EU (2011). Council Directive 2011/96/EU of 30 November 2011 on the Common System of Taxation Applicable in the Case of Parent Companies and Subsidiaries of Different Member States. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32011L0096&from=en
    6. Czech National Bank (2018). Balance of Payments Statistics. Prague: Czech National Bank. Available at: https://www.cnb.cz/cs/statistika/platebni_bilance_stat/publikace_pb/bezny_ucet_pb_tc/
    7. Datt, K. H. (2014). Paying a Fair Share of Tax and Aggressive Tax Planning - A Tale of Two Myths. EJournal of Tax Research, 12(2), 410-432. Available at: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1674651839?accountid=17203
    8. Davies, R. B., Martin, J., Parenti, M., et al. (2015). Knocking on Tax Haven's Door: Multinational Firms and Transfer Pricing. SSRN Paper No. ID2666947.
    9. Desai, M. A., Foley, C. F., Hines, J. R. (2003) Chains of Ownership, Regional Tax Competition, and Foreign Direct Investment, in Herrmann, H., Lipsey, R., eds., Foreign Direct Investment in the Real and Financial Sector of Industrial Countries. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 61-98, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24736-4_4 Go to original source...
    10. Devereux, M. P., Lockwood, B., Redoano, M. (2008). Do Countries Compete over Corporate Tax Rates? Journal of Public Economics, 92(5-6), 1210-1235, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.09.005 Go to original source...
    11. European Commission (2012). Commission Recommendation of 6 December 2012 on Aggressive Tax Planning (2012/772/EU). Available at: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/fff0ff5a-4451-11e2-9b3b-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
    12. European Commission (2015). Study on Structures of Aggressive Tax Planning and Indicators. Final Report. WP No. 61-2015. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/sites/taxation/files/resources/documents/taxation/gen_info/economic_analysis/tax_papers/taxation_paper_61.pdf
    13. European Commission (2017). Aggressive Tax Planning Indicators. Final Report. WP No. 71 - 2017. Specific Contract No. 5 TAXUD/2016/DE/319 Implementing the Framework Service Contract No. TAXUD/2015/CC/131 for the Provision of Economic Analysis in the Area of Taxation. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/sites/taxation/files/taxation_papers_71_atp_.pdf
    14. European Commission (2018). Data on Taxation. Effective Tax Rates, Non-financial Sector. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/business/economic-analysis-taxation/data-taxation_en
    15. Fuest, C., Riedel, N. (2009). Tax Evasion, Tax Avoidance and Tax Expenditures in Developing Countries: A Review of the Literature. Report. Oxford: Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a08b3de5274a31e0000a66/60670_TaxEvasionReportDFIDFINAL1906.pdf
    16. Fuest, C., Riedel, N. (2012). Tax Evasion and Tax Avoidance: The Role of International Profit Shifting. Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation. Working Paper No. 10/12.
    17. Grubert, H. (2003). Intangible Income, Intercompany Transactions, Income Shifting, and the Choice of Location. National Tax Journal, 56(1), 221-242, https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2003.1s.05 Go to original source...
    18. Haberly, D., Wojcik, D. (2014). Tax Havens and the Production of Offshore FDI: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(1), 75-101, https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu003 Go to original source...
    19. Heckemeyer, J. H., Overesch, M. (2013). Multinationals' Profit Response to Tax Differentials: Effect Size and Shifting Channels. ZEW - Centre for European Economic Research. Discussion Paper No. 13-045, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2303679 Go to original source...
    20. Huesecken, B., Overesch, M. (2015). Tax Avoidance through Advance Tax Rulings - Evidence from the LuxLeaks Firms, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2664631 Go to original source...
    21. International Monetary Fund (2014). Spillovers in International Corporate Taxation. International Monetary Fund. Washington D.C. IMF Policy Paper No. 2014/071, https://doi.org/10.5089/9781498343367.007 Go to original source...
    22. Janský, P., Koke¹, O. (2015). Corporate Tax Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Out of the Czech Republic. Post-Communist Economies, 27(4). 537-546, https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2015.1084733 Go to original source...
    23. Janský, P., Koke¹, O. (2016). Profit-shifting from the Czech Multinational Companies to European Tax Havens. Applied Economic Letters, 23(16), 1130-1133, http://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2015.1137543 Go to original source...
    24. Lipsey, R. E. (2010). Measuring the Location of Production in a World of Intangible Productive Assets, FDI, and Intra firm Trade. Review of Income and Wealth, 56(1), S99-S110, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2010.00385.x Go to original source...
    25. Nerudova, D., Solilova, V., Litzman, M., et al. (2018). International Tax Planning within the Structure of Corporate Entities Owned by the Shareholder-individual through Panama Papers Destinations. Development Policy Review, 38(1), 124-139, https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12403 Go to original source...
    26. Nilsson, J.-E., Laulajainen, R., Stafford, H. A. (1996). Corporate Geography: Business Location Principles and Cases. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 78(3), 183-185, https://doi.org/10.2307/490835 Go to original source...
    27. Oats, L., Tuck, P. (2019). Corporate Tax Avoidance: is Tax Transparency the Solution? Accounting and Business Research, 49(5), 565-583, https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2019.1611726 Go to original source...
    28. OECD (2015). OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project. 2015 Final Reports. Executive Summary. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/ctp/beps-reports-2015-executive-summaries.pdf
    29. Pavel, J., Tepperová, J. (2019). FDI and Base Erosion and Profit Shifting from the Czech Republic. Working Paper presented at 24th International Conference Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Public Finance, 12th and 13th April 2019, Prague. To be published in proceedings.
    30. Sikka, P., Willmott, H. (2010). The Dark Side of Transfer Pricing: Its Role in Tax Avoidance and Wealth Retentiveness. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(4), 342-356, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2010.02.004 Go to original source...
    31. Sutherland, D., Matthews, B. (2009). 'Round Tripping' or 'Capital Augmenting' OFDI? Chinese Outward Investment and the Caribbean Tax Havens. Paper prepared for Leverhulme Centre for Research on Globalisation and Economic Policy (GEP), University of Nottingham 14th and 15th January.
    32. Tanzi, V. (1996). Globalization, Tax Competition and the Future of Tax Systems. International Monetary Fund. Working Paper No. 1996/141, https://doi.org/10.5089/ 9781451928280.001 Go to original source...
    33. Tax Justice Network (2005). The Price of Off Shore. Briefing Paper. Available at: https://www.taxjustice.net/cms/upload/pdf/Price_of_Offshore.pdf
    34. UNCTAD (2015a). FDI, Tax and Development. The Fiscal Role of Multinational Enterprises: Towards Guidelines for Coherent International Tax and Investment Policies. UNCTAD Investment and Enterprise Division. Working Paper No. 3/26/2015.
    35. UNCTAD (2015b). An FDI-driven Approach to Measuring the Scale and Economic Impact of BEPS. ANNEX II - Technical background paper accompanying the UNCTAD. Working Paper on "FDI, Tax and Development". UNCTAD Investment and Enterprise Division, Working Paper No. 3/26/2015.
    36. UNCTAD (2015c). World Investment Report 2015: Reforming International Investment Governance [online]. Chapter V. International Tax and Investment Policy Coherence. New York and Geneva: UNCTAD NATIONS, https://doi.org/10.18356/293b1525-en Go to original source...
    37. Van't Riet, M., Lejour, A. (2014). Ranking the Stars: Network Analysis of Bilateral Tax Treaties. CPB. Discussion Paper No. 290.
    38. Vicard, V. (2015). Profit Shifting Through Transfer Pricing: Evidence from French Firm Level Trade Data. Banque de France. Working Paper No. 555, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2614864 Go to original source...
    39. Weyzig, F. (2013). Tax Treaty Shopping: Structural Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment Routed through the Netherlands. International Tax and Public Finance, 20(6), 910-937, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-012-9250-z Go to original source...
    40. White, H. (1980). A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817-838, https://doi.org/10.2307/1912934 Go to original source...
    41. Wooldridge, J. M. (2012). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Mason, Ohio: South-Western Cengage Learning.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content