Prague Economic Papers 2020, 29(4):481-501 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.733

Sustainability of Current Account Surpluses: Evidence from European Countries

Ayºen Sivrikayaa, Zühal Kurula
a Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

Over the last two decades, the current accounts in the European Union (EU) have diverged substantially. This divergence has raised concerns about the sustainability of the core countries' current account surpluses since the peripheral countries' financing of their significantly rising levels of current deficits depends on them. In this study, by applying both linear and nonlinear unit root tests and taking into account structural breaks in the data-generating process, we examine the current account sustainability of the main core countries with large external surpluses. We find that the current accounts of Austria, Denmark and Germany are not on sustainable paths, which suggests that the core economies might not continue to run surpluses to finance the peripheral countries' external deficits. The results of this study imply that the policymakers in peripheral countries might take proactive measures against possible borrowing problems and capital outflow risk in the future.

Keywords: European imbalances, current account sustainability, nonlinear unit root tests
JEL classification: C51, F10, F32

Received: July 5, 2018; Accepted: June 7, 2019; Prepublished online: March 13, 2020; Published: August 31, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Sivrikaya, A., & Kurul, Z. (2020). Sustainability of Current Account Surpluses: Evidence from European Countries. Prague Economic Papers, 29(4), 481-501. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.733
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Anders, L. N. (2017). The German Current Account: A Comparison of American and European Perspectives and Policies. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/sire/54/
    2. Bayoumi, T., Eichengreen, B. (1993). Shocking Aspects of European Monetary Integration, in Torres, F., Giavazzi, F., eds., Adjustment and Growth in the European Monetary Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 193-235, https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511599231.014 Go to original source...
    3. Bertola, G., Driffill, J., James, H., Sinn, H. W., Sturm, J. E., Valentinyi, Á. (2013). European Imbalances. CESifo. Munich EEAG Report on the European Economy, pp. 55-72. Available at: http://www.cesifo-group.de/DocDL/eeag_report_chap2_2013.pdf
    4. Blanchard, O., Giavazzi, F. (2002). Current Account Deficits in the Euro Area: the End of the Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 147-209, https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2003.0001 Go to original source...
    5. Campa, J. M., Gavilan, A. (2011). Current Accounts in the Euro Area: An Intertemporal Approach. Journal of International Money and Finance, 30(1), 205-228, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2010.08.003 Go to original source...
    6. Caner, M., Hansen, B. E. (2001). Threshold Autoregression with a Unit Root. Econometrica, 69(6), 1555-1596, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00257 Go to original source...
    7. Cecen, A., Xiao, L. (2014). Capital Flows and Current Account Dynamics in Turkey: A Nonlinear Time Series Analysis. Economic Modelling, 39, 240-246,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.03.010 Go to original source...
    8. Chen, R., Milesi-Ferretti, G. M., Tressel, T. (2013). External Imbalances in the Eurozone. Economic Policy, 28(73), 101-142,https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0327.12004 Go to original source...
    9. Chen, S. W. (2014). Smooth Transition, non-linearity and Current Account Sustainability: Evidence from the European Countries. Economic Modelling, 38, 541-554, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.02.003 Go to original source...
    10. Chen, S. W., Xie, Z. (2015). Testing for Current Account Sustainability under Assumptions of Smooth Break and Nonlinearity. International Review of Economics & Finance, 38, 142-156, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2015.02.015 Go to original source...
    11. Chortareas, G. E., Kapetanios, G., Uctum, M. (2004). An Investigation of Current Account Solvency in Latin America using Nonlinear Nonstationarity Tests. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 8(1), https://doi.org/10.2202/1558-3708.1200 Go to original source...
    12. Christopoulos, D., León-Ledesma, M. A. (2010). Current Account Sustainability in the US: What did we Really Know about it? Journal of International Money and Finance, 29(3), 442-459,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2009.06.014 Go to original source...
    13. Den Haan, M. E., Ellison, M., Ilzetzki, E., McMahon, M., Reis, R. (2016). The Danger of Germany's Current Account Surpluses: Results of the CFM and CEPR Survey. Vox CEPR's Policy Portal, 27. Available at: https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/research/centres/cage/manage/publications/74_den_haan_1_17_the_danger_of_germanys.pdf
    14. Dickey, D. A., Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427-431, https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1979.10482531 Go to original source...
    15. Dickey, D. A., Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 49(4), 1057-1072, https://doi.org/10.2307/1912517 Go to original source...
    16. Dooley, M. P., Folkerts-Landau, D., Garber, P. (2004). The Revived Bretton Woods System: the Effects of Periphery Intervention and Reserve Management on Interest Rates & Exchange Rates in Center Countries. National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge Working Paper No. 10332, https://doi.org/10.3386/w10332 Go to original source...
    17. Edwards, S. (2007). On Current Account Surpluses and the Correction of Global Imbalances. National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge Working Papers No. 12904, https://doi.org/10.3386/w12904 Go to original source...
    18. Enders, W., Granger, C. W. J. (1998). Unit-root Tests and Asymmetric Adjustment with an Example Using the Term Structure of Interest Rates. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 16(3), 304-311, https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1998.10524769 Go to original source...
    19. European Commission (2012). Current Account Surpluses in EU. European Union, https://doi.org/10.2765/19685 Go to original source...
    20. Gourinchas, P.-O. (2002). Comments on Current Account Deficits in the Euro Area. The End of the Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 196-206,https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2003.0001 Go to original source...
    21. Hakkio, C. S., Rush, M. (1991). Is the Budget Deficit "Too Large? Economic Inquiry, 29(3), 429-445,https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1991.tb00837.x Go to original source...
    22. Holmes, M. J. (2006). How Sustainable are OECD Current Account Balances in the Long Run? The Manchester School, 74(5), 626-643, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.2006.00514.x Go to original source...
    23. Holmes, M. J., Otero, J., Panagiotidis, T. (2010). On the Stationarity of Current Account Deficits in the European Union. Review of International Economics, 18(4), 730-740, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2010.00896.x Go to original source...
    24. Kapetanios, G., Shin, Y., Snell, A. (2003). Testing for a Unit Root in the Nonlinear STAR Framework. Journal of Econometrics, 112(2), 359-379, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(02)00202-6 Go to original source...
    25. Karunaratne, N. D. (2010). The Sustainability of Australia's Current Account Deficits-A Reappraisal after the Global Financial Crisis. Journal of Policy Modeling, 32(1), 81-97, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2009.10.002 Go to original source...
    26. Kollmann, R., Ratto, M., Roeger, W., Vogel, L. (2015). What Drives the German Current Account? And How does it Affect other EU Member States? Economic Policy, 30(81), 47-93, https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiu004 Go to original source...
    27. Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C., Schmidt, P., Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity Against the Alternative of a Unit Root: How Sure are we that Economic Time Series have a Unit Root? Journal of Econometrics, 54(1-3), 159-178, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y Go to original source...
    28. Lane, P. R., Pels, B. (2012). Current Account Imbalances in Europe (May 2012). CEPR. Discussion Paper No. 8958. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/8958.html
    29. Leybourne, S., Newbold, P., Vougas, D. (1998). Unit Roots and Smooth Transitions. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 19(1), 83-97, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9892.00078 Go to original source...
    30. Liu, P. C., Tanner, E. (1996). International Intertemporal Solvency in Industrialized Countries: Evidence and Implications. Southern Economic Journal, 62(3), 739-749, https://doi.org/10.2307/1060891 Go to original source...
    31. Michael, P., Nobay, A. R., Peel, D. A. (1997). Transactions Costs and Nonlinear Adjustment in Real Exchange Rates; An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Political Economy, 105(4), 862-879, https://doi.org/10.1086/262096 Go to original source...
    32. Micossi, S., D'Onofrio, A., Peirce, F. (2018). On German External Imbalances. CEPS Policy Insight. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3300630 Go to original source...
    33. Nag, B., Mukherjee, J. (2012). The Sustainability of Trade Deficits in the Presence of Endogenous Structural Breaks: Evidence from the Indian Economy. Journal of Asian Economics, 23(5), 519-526, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2012.05.003 Go to original source...
    34. Obstfeld, M., Rogoff, K. S. (1996). Foundations of International Macroeconomics. Cambridge, MA: MIT press. ISBN 9780262150477.
    35. OECD (2018). OECD Stat, (database). Available at: https://stats.oecd.org/
    36. Perron, P. (1989). The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 57(6), 1361-1401, https://doi.org/10.2307/1913712 Go to original source...
    37. Perron, P. (1997). Further Evidence on Breaking Trend Functions in Macroeconomic Variables. Journal of Econometrics, 80(2), 355-385,https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(97)00049-3 Go to original source...
    38. Perron, P., Vogelsang, T. J. (1992). Nonstationarity and Level Shifts with an Application to Purchasing Power Parity. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 301-320, https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1992.10509907 Go to original source...
    39. Priewe, J. (2018). A Time Bomb for the Euro? Understanding Germany's Current Account Surplus. IMK Study No. 59. Available at: https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/191722
    40. Roubini, N., Setser, B. (2005). Will the Bretton Woods 2 Regime Unravel Soon? The Risk of a Hard Landing in 2005-2006. Unpublished Manuscript, New York University and Oxford University, 6.
    41. Said, S. E., Dickey, D. A. (1984). Testing for Unit Roots in Autoregressive-moving Average Models of Unknown Order. Biometrika, 71(3), 599-607, https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/71.3.599 Go to original source...
    42. Schmitz, B., von Hagen, J. (2011). Current Account Imbalances and Financial Integration in the Euro Area. Journal of International Money and Finance, 30(8), 1676-1695, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2011.08.003 Go to original source...
    43. Semmler, W., Tahri, I. (2017). Current Account Imbalances: A New Approach to Assess External Debt Sustainability. Economic Modelling, 62, 161-170, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.12.005 Go to original source...
    44. Sinn, H. W., Koll, R. (2000). The Euro, Interest Rates and European Economic Growth. München: ifo Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München. CESifo Forum 1(3), pp. 30-31). Available at: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/166058/1/cesifo-forum-v01-y2000-i3-p30-31.pdf
    45. Sollis, R. (2004). Asymmetric Adjustment and Smooth Transitions: a Combination of some Unit Root Tests. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 25(3), 409-417, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.2004.01911.x Go to original source...
    46. Stockhammer, E., Constantine, C., Reissl, S. (2016). Explaining the Euro Crisis: Current Account Imbalances, Credit Booms and Economic Policy in Different Economic Paradigms. Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES). Working Papers PKWP1617.
    47. Teräsvirta, T. (1994). Specification, Estimation, and Evaluation of Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(425), 208-218, https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1994.10476462 Go to original source...
    48. Teräsvirta, T., Anderson, H. M. (1992). Characterizing Nonlinearities in Business Cycles Using Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 7(S1), 119-136, https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.3950070509 Go to original source...
    49. Trehan, B., Walsh, C. E. (1991). Testing Intertemporal Budget Constraints: Theory and Applications to US Federal Budget and Current Account Deficits. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 23(2), 206-223, https://doi.org/10.2307/1992777 Go to original source...
    50. Ucar, N., Omay, T. (2009). Testing for Unit Root in Nonlinear Heterogeneous Panels. Economics Letters, 104(1), 5-8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2009.03.018 Go to original source...
    51. van Dijk, D. J. C. (1999). Smooth Transition Models: Extensions and Outlier Robust Inference. Tinbergen Institute Research Series No. 200.
    52. Zivot, E., Andrews, D. W. K. (2002). Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-price Shock, and the Unit-root Hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20(1), 25-44, https://doi.org/10.1198/073500102753410372 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content