Prague Economic Papers 2017, 26(5):561-577 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.629

The Proposal of a Tool for Candidates Selection for Employment. The Case of Survey Interviewers

Alina Morosanu1, Elisabeta Jaba2, Daniela Serban3
1 Department of Accounting, Computer Science and Statistics, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University Iasi, Romania (alynamorosanu@yahoo.com)
2 Department of Accounting, Computer Science and Statistics, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University Iasi, Romania (ejaba@uaic.ro)
3 Department of Statistics and Econometrics, Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, Romania (danielaserban2002@yahoo.com)

This study purpose is a questionnaire development used to quantify survey interviewer cha- racteristics. Five dimensions of personality were used: conscientiousness, extraversion, agree-ableness, emotional stability and openness. Those dimensions where measured using a Likert scale with 6 points. In total, 107 survey interviewers from a branch of private companies specialized in public opinion research answered the questionnaire's questions. Reliability of the questionnaire was assessed by internal consistency. A preliminary list of 25 items was prepared as a starting point. After evaluation of validity, five items were rejected. The new measurement instrument with 20 items was finally developed. The content validity index for the final questionnaire was found acceptable. Results showed that final questionnaire was internally consistent.

Keywords: survey interviewer, characteristics of personality, questionnaire, reliability, validity
JEL classification: C83, J21, J24

Published: October 1, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Morosanu, A., Jaba, E., & Serban, D. (2017). The Proposal of a Tool for Candidates Selection for Employment. The Case of Survey Interviewers. Prague Economic Papers, 26(5), 561-577. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.629
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Abbott, C., Yost, B., Harding, J. (2003). Personality Type as a Predictor of Respondent Performance. Survey Research, 34(3), 1-16. [Retrieved 2015-11-15] Available at: http://www.srl.uic.edu/newsletter/issues/2000s/03v34n3.pdf
    2. Allahyari, T., Rangi, N. H., Khosravi, Y., Zayeri, F. (2011). Development and Evaluation of a New Questionnaire for Rating of Cognitive Failures at Work. International Journal of Occupational Hygiene, 3, 6-11. [Retrieved 2015-11-15] Available at: http://archiwum.ciop.pl/64167
    3. Blaydes, L., Gillum, R. M. (2013). Religiosity-of-Interviewer Effects: Assessing the Impact of Veiled Enumerators on Survey Response in Egypt. Politics and Religion, 6(3), 459-482, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048312000557 Go to original source...
    4. Blohm, M., Hox, J., Koch, A. (2007). The Influence of Interviewers Contact Behavior on the Contact and Cooperation Rate in Face-to-Face Household Surveys. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19(1), 97-111, https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh120 Go to original source...
    5. Burger, J. M., Soroka, S., Gonzago, K., Murphy, E., Somervell, E. (2001). The Effect of Fleeting Attraction on Compliance to Requests. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(12), 1578-1586. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012712002 Go to original source...
    6. Cortina, J. M. (1993). What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications. Journals of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 93-104, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98 Go to original source...
    7. Couper, M. P. (2005). Technology Trends in Survey Data Collection. Social Science Computer Review, 23(4), 486-501, https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439305278972 Go to original source...
    8. Crano, W. D., Brewer, M. B. (1973). Principles of Research in Social Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-1-4533228-8-8.
    9. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555 Go to original source...
    10. Davis, D. W., Silver, B. D. (2003). Stereotype Threat and Race of Respondent Effects in a Survey on Political Knowledge. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 33-45, https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00003 Go to original source...
    11. Davis, R. E., Couper, M. P., Janz, N. K., Caldwell, C. H., Resnicow, K. (2010). Respondent Effects in Public Health Surveys. Health Education Research, 25(1), 14-26, https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyp046 Go to original source...
    12. De Leeuw, E. (2005). To Mix or not to Mix? Data Collection Modes in Surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 21(2), 1-23. [Retrieved 2015-11-15] Available at: http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic1327921.files/DeLeeuw2005.pdf
    13. Dillmana, D. A., Phelps, G., Tortora, R., Swift, K., Kohrell, J., Berck, J., Messer B. L. (2009). Response Rate and Measurement Differences in Mixed-Mode Surveys Using Mail, Telephone, Interactive Voice Response (IVR) and the Internet. Social Science Research, 38(1), 1-18, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.03.007 Go to original source...
    14. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality Structure: Emergence of the Five-Factor Model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 417-440, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221 Go to original source...
    15. Durrant, G. B., Groves, R. M., Staetsky, L., Steele, F. (2010). Effects of Respondent Attitudes and Behaviors on Refusal in Household Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(1), 1-36, https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp098 Go to original source...
    16. Dykema, J., DiLoreto, K., Price, J., White, E., Schaeffer N. C. (2012). ACASI Gender-of Respondent Voice Effects on Reports to Questions about Sensitive Behaviors among Young Adults. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(2), 311-325, https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs021 Go to original source...
    17. Fillmore, C. J. (1999). A Linguistic Look at Survey Research, in Sirken, M., Herrmann, D.J., Schechter, S., Schwarz, N., Tanur, J., Tourangeau, R., ed., Cognition and Survey Research. New York: Wiley. ISBN 978-1-84860-116-1, pp. 183-19.
    18. Ford, K., Norris, A. E. (1997). Effects of Respondent Age on Reporting of Sexual and Reproductive Behavior of Hispanic and African American Youth. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Science, 19(3), 369-376, https://doi.org/10.1177/07399863970193008 Go to original source...
    19. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The Development of Markers for the Big Five Factor Structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26-42, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26 Go to original source...
    20. Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., Gough, H. G. (2005). The International Personality Item Pool and the Future of Public-Domain Personality Measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84-96, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007 Go to original source...
    21. Goodwin, C. (2009). Research in Psychology: Methods and Design. Wiley. ISBN 978-0470522783.
    22. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., Swann, W. B. (2003). A Very Brief Measure of the Big Five Personality Domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504-528, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1 Go to original source...
    23. Hansen, K. M (2007). The Effects of Incentives, Interview Length and Respondent Characteristics on Response Rates in a CATY-Study. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19(1), 112-121, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edl022 Go to original source...
    24. Haunberger, S. (2010). The Effects of Respondent, Respondent and Area Characteristics on Cooperation in Panel Surveys: A Multilevel Approach. Quality & Quantity, 44(5), 957-969, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-009-9248-5 Go to original source...
    25. Härdle, W., Simar, L. (2007). Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 3540722432.
    26. Haynes, S., Richard, D., Kubany, E. (1995). Content Validity in Psychological Assessment: A Functional Approach to Concepts and Methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238-247, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238 Go to original source...
    27. Herzog, A. R., Willard, L. R. (1988). Age and Response Rates to Interview Sample Surveys. Journal of Gerontology, 43(6), 200-205, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronj/43.6.S200 Go to original source...
    28. Holland, J. L. (1958). A Personality Inventory Employing Occupational Titles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 42(5), 336-342, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0047330 Go to original source...
    29. Holland, J. L. (1985). Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Careers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. ISBN 0135478286.
    30. Hox, J. J., de Leeuw, E. D. (2002). The Influence of Respondents' Attitude and Behaviour on Household Survey Nonresponse: An International Comparison, in Groves, R.M., Dillman, D. A., Eltinge, J.L., Little, R.J., ed., Survey Nonresponse. New York: Wiley. ISBN: 978-0-471-39627-7, pp. 103-118.
    31. Jaba, E. (2002). Statistics. Third Edition. Economic Publisher, Bucharest. ISBN 973-590-666-X.
    32. Jäckle, A., Lynn, P., Sinibaldi, J., Tipping, S. (2013). The Effect of Respondent Experience, Attitudes, Personality and Skills on Respondent Co-operation with Face-to-Face Surveys. Survey Research Methods, 7(1), 1-15, http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2013.v7i1.4736 Go to original source...
    33. Johnson, R. A., Wichern, D. W. (2007). Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. 6th ed., Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education. ISBN 000-0131877151.
    34. Joseph, W. B. (1982). The Credibility of Physically Attractive Communicators: A Review. Journal of Advertising, 11(3), 15-24, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1982.10672807 Go to original source...
    35. Kane, E.W., Macaulay, L. J. (1993). Interviewer Gender and Gender Attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57(1), 1-28, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/269352 Go to original source...
    36. Kenneth, K. B., Olson, J. R., Calantone, R. J., Jackson, E. C. (2002). Print versus electronicSurveys: A Comparison of Two Data Collection Methodologies. Journal of Operations Management, 20(4), 357-373, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00004-9 Go to original source...
    37. Kline, P. (1993). The Handbook of Psychological Testing. New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0415211581.
    38. Lawshe, C. (1975). A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575, http://dx.doi.org/10.1.1.460.9380 Go to original source...
    39. Lee, J., Paek, I. (2014). In Search of the Optimal Number of Categories in a Rating Scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32(7), 663-673, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0734282914522200 Go to original source...
    40. Liu, M., Stainback, K. (2013). Respondent Gender Effects on Survey Responses to Marriage Related Questions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 77(2), 606-618, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nft019 Go to original source...
    41. McDonald, H., Adam, S. (2003). A Comparison of Online and Postal Data Collection Methods in Marketing Research. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 21(2), 85-95, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02634500310465399 Go to original source...
    42. Mendoza, J. L., Stafford, K. L., Stauffer, J. M. (2000). Large-Sample Confidence Intervals for Validity and Reliability Coefficients. Psychological Methods, 5(3), 356-369, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.5.3.356 Go to original source...
    43. Michell, J. (1986). Measurement Scales and Statistics: A Clash of Paradigms. Quantitative Methods in Psychology, 100(3), 398-407. [Retrieved 2015-11-15] Available at: http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&id=1987-09255-001 Go to original source...
    44. Michell, J. (1997). Quantitative Science and the Definition of Measurement in Psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 88(3), 355-383, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1997.tb02641.x Go to original source...
    45. Murphy, J., Dean, E., Cook, S., Keating, M. (2010). The Effect of Respondent Image in a Virtual-World Survey. RTI Press publication No. RR-0014-1012. Research Triangle Park. NC: RTI Press, http://dx.doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2010.rr.0014.1012 Go to original source...
    46. Nunnally, J.C., Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0070478497.
    47. Olson, K., Bilgen, I. (2011). The Role of Respondent Experience on Acquiescence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(1), 99-114, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq067 Go to original source...
    48. Osburn, H. G. (2000). Coefficient Alpha and Related Internal Consistency Reliability Coefficients. Psychological Methods, 5(3), 343-355, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.5.3.343 Go to original source...
    49. Preston, C. C., Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal Number of Response Categories in Rating Scale: Reliability, Validity, Discriminating Power, and Respondent Preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104, 1-15, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5 Go to original source...
    50. Schuman, H., Converse, J. M. (1971). The Effects of Black and White Respondents on Black Responses in 1968. Public Opinion Quarterly, 35(1), 44-68, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/267866 Go to original source...
    51. Singer, E., Frankel, M. R., Glassman, M. B. (1983). The Effect of Respondent Characteristics and Expectations on Response. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 68-83, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/268767 Go to original source...
    52. Stoetzel, J., Girard, Y. A. (1973). Les sondages d'opinion publique. (Public Opinion Polls). Presses Universitaires de France. ISBN 978-2130360513.
    53. Summers, G. F., Hammonds, A. D. (1966). Effect of Racial Characteristics of Investigator on Self Enumerated Responses to a Negro Prejudice Scale. Social Forces, 44(4), 515-518, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sf/44.4.515 Go to original source...
    54. Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., Rasinski K. (2000). The Psychology of Survey Response. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521576291. Go to original source...
    55. Waltz, C., Strickland, O., Lenz, E. (2010). Measurement in Nursing and Health Research. Springer Publishing Company. ISBN 978-0826105073.
    56. Webster C. (1996). Hispanic and Anglo Respondent and Respondent Ethnicity and Gender: The Impact on Survey Response Quality. Journal of Marketing Research, 33(1), 62-72, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3152013 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content