Prague Economic Papers 2012, 21(3):291-308 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.425

The Weber-Fechner Law and Public Expenditures Impact to the Win-Margins at Parliamentary Elections

Paulo Jorge Reis Mourao
Economics & Management School, University of Minho, 4700 Braga - Portugal (paulom@eeg.uminho.pt).

This paper discusses the electoral implications of psychological motivation on voting functions. We tested a claim of the Weber-Fechner law as applied to electoral behaviour - specifically, that an expanded public sector leads politicians to make more significant, opportunistic distortions of public expenditures than the distortions observed when the public sector is diminished. We employed a system of simultaneous equations to test this hypothesis for cases observed in more than sixty democracies since 1960. We gave a special focus to the cases of Central and Eastern European countries. Our results confirm the main implications of the Weber-Fechner law. Years in incumbency, running for re-election, higher unemployment and higher inflation rates tend to generate negative moods, feelings and affects in the electorate; thus, these factors tend to approximate the vote share of the most voted party to the remaining vote share of the challenger political forces.

Klíčová slova: voting, Central and Eastern European economies, Weber-Fechner law
JEL classification: D03, D72, P20

Zveřejněno: 1. leden 2012  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mourao, P.J.R. (2012). The Weber-Fechner Law and Public Expenditures Impact to the Win-Margins at Parliamentary Elections. Prague Economic Papers21(3), 291-308. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.425
Stáhnout citaci

Reference

  1. Aidt, T., Veiga, F., Veiga, L. (2010), "Election Results and Opportunistic Policies: A New Test of the Rational Political Business Cycle Model." Public Choice. Forthcoming. DOI 10.1007/s11127-010-9644-3. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  2. Akhmedov, A., Zhuravskaya, E. (2004), "Opportunistic Political Cycles: Test in a Young Democracy Setting." The Quarterly Journal of Economics 119, No. 4, pp. 1301-38. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  3. Alt, J., Lassen, D. (2006), "Fiscal Transparency, Political Parties, and Debt In OECD Countries." European Economic Review 50, No. 6, pp. 1403-39. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  4. Barro, R., Lee, J. (2000), "International Data on Educational Attainment: Updates and Implications." Manuscript, Harvard University. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  5. Bellany, I. (1973), "The Problems of Balancing Reductions in Conventional Forces." The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 17, No. 4 (Dec. 1973), pp. 657-671. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  6. Bernoulli, D. (1738), Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis. Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae. 5. Ed., pp. 175-192.
  7. Brader, T. (2006), Campaigning for Hearts and Minds: How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  8. Brandstätter, E., Brandstätter, H. (1996), "What's Money Worth? Determinants of the Subjective Value of Money." Journal of Economic Psychology. Vol. 17, pp. 443-464 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  9. Brender, A., Drazen, A. (2004), "Political Budget Cycles in New versus Established Democracies." NBER Working Papers Series 10539, 2004. (http://www.econ.umd.edu/~drazen/Data_Sets/Data_Sets.html). Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  10. Brender, A., Drazen, A. (2007), "Electoral Fiscal Policy in New, Old, and Fragile Democracies." Comparative Economic Studies Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 446-66. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  11. Brug, W., C. Eijk, Franklin, M. (2007), The Economy and the Vote: Economic Conditions and Elections in Fifteen Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  12. Caplan, B. (2007), The Myth of the Rational Voter. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.
  13. Chote, R., C. Emmerson, Tetlow, G. (2008), "The UK Public Finances: Ready for Recession?" The Institute for Fiscal Studies, IFS Briefing Note 79 (2008).
  14. Coates, D. (2004), "Additional Incumbent Spending Really Can Harm (at least some) Incumbents: An Analysis of Vote Share Maximization". Public Choice Vol. 95, pp. 63-87. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  15. Conover, P. (1981), "Political Cues and the Perception of Candidates". American Politics Quarterly, Vol. 9, pp. 427-448. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  16. DPI (2008), Database of Political Institutions. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2008.
  17. Edelman, M. (2001), The Politics of Misinformation: Communication, Society and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  18. Fechner, G. (1860), Elemente der Psychophysik. Lepzig: Breitkopf und Härtel, (reprint Amsterdam: Bonset, 1964).
  19. Hibbs, D. (1977), "Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy." American Political Science Review, Vol. 71, pp. 1467-87. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  20. Hibbs, D. (1987), The American Political Economy: Macroeconomics and Electoral Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  21. Hsiao, C. (2002), Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  22. IFS (2006), International Financial Statistics. New York: International Monetary Fund, 2006.
  23. Kates, S. (2004), "A Qualitative Exploration into Voters' Ethical Perceptions of Political Advertising: Discourse, Disinformation, and Moral Boundaries" Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 17, pp. 1871-85. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  24. Kinder, D., Kiewiet, D. (1981), "Sociotropic Politics: The American Case." British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 11, pp. 129-61. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  25. Kramer, G. (1983), "The Ecological Fallacy Revisited: Aggregate Versus Individual-level Findings on Economics and Elections, and Sociotropic Voting." American Political Science Review, Vol. 77, pp. 92-111. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  26. Lewis-Beck, M., Norpoth, H., Weisberg, H., Jacoby, W. (2008), The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2008. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  27. Marcus, G. (1988), "The Structure of Emotional Response: 1984 Presidential Candidates." American Political Science Review, Vol. 82. pp. 737-62. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  28. Marcus, G., Neuman, R., MacKuen, M. (2000), Affective Intelligence and Political Judgement. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2000.
  29. Masin, S., Zudini, V., Antonelli, M. (2009), "Early Alternative Derivations of Fechner's Law". Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 56-65. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  30. Nannestad, P., Paldam, M. (1994),"The VP-Function: A Survey of the Literature on Vote and Popularity Functions after 25 Years." Public Choice, Vol. 79, No. 3-4, pp. 213-45. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  31. Niskanen, W. (1998), "A Vote for Perot Was a Vote for the Status Quo." Cato Journal, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 85-91.
  32. Nordhaus, W. (1975), "The Political Business Cycle." Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 42, pp. 169-90. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  33. Puviani, A. (1903), Teoria della illusione finanziaria, Palermo: Sandron, 1903.
  34. Shi, M., Svensson, J. (2006), "Political Budget Cycles: Do They Differ across Countries and Why?" Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 90, pp.1367-89. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  35. Shi, M., Svensson, J. (2002), "Political Budget Cycles in Developed and Developing Countries." Manuscript, Institute for International Economic Studies, Stockholm University, 2002.
  36. Shoemaker, P., Reese, S. (1991), Mediating the Message. Theories of Influence on Mass Media Contents. New York, London: Longman, 1991.
  37. Sinn, H. (2003), "Weber's Law and the Biological Evolution of Risk Preferences: The Selective Dominance of the Logarithmic Utility Function, 2002 Geneva Risk Lecture." The GENEVA Papers on Risk and Insurance - Theory; Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 87-100. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  38. Skouras, T., Avlonitis, G., Indounas, K. (2005), "Economics and Marketing on Pricing: How and Why Do They Differ?" Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 362-374. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  39. Stevens, S. (1962). "The Surprising Simplicity of Sensory Metrics," American Psychologist, Vol 17, No. 1, pp. 17, 29-39. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  40. Stevens, S. (1975), Psychophysics: Introduction to its Perceptual, Neural and Social Prospects. New York: Wiley, 1975. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  41. Stimson, J. (1999), Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. Boulder: Westview Press, 1999.
  42. Tufte, E. (1978), Political Control of the Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  43. Von Mises, M. (1949), Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1949.
  44. Weber, E. (1834), De pulsu, resorptione, auditu et tactu. Annotationes anatomicae et physiologicae. Leipzig: Koehler, 1834.
  45. Wooldridge, J. (200), Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.
  46. Zafirovski, M. (2001), "Max Weber's Analysis of Marginal Utility Theory and Psychology Revisited: Latent Propositions in Economic Sociology and the Sociology of Economics." History of Political Economy, Vol. 33, No. 3; pp. 437-458. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...

Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), která umožňuje nekomerční distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.