Prague Economic Papers 2006, 15(1):44-49 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.275

International Intertemporal Solvency in OECD Countries: Evidence from Panel Unit Root

Hüseyin Kalyoncu
Department of Economics, Cukurova University 01330, Adana, TURKEY (e-mail: kalyuncu@cu.edu.tr).

The purpose of this study is to investigate the sustainability of current account of 22 OECD countries by employing Liu and Tanner (1996) testing procedure. The procedure used here is to examine stationarity of current account. By using ADF unit root test on single time series, it has been found that current account of most OECD countries have unit root. This outcome, however, might be due to the generally low power of this test. The aim of this paper is to reconsider this issue by exploiting the extra information provided by the combination of the time-series and cross-sectional data and the subsequent power advantages of panel data unit root tests. We apply the test advocated by Im, Pesaran and Shin (1997). According to estimation, current account deficits in OECD countries are sustainable.

Keywords: current account, panel data unit-root test, solvency
JEL classification: C23, F30, F32

Published: January 1, 2006  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kalyoncu, H. (2006). International Intertemporal Solvency in OECD Countries: Evidence from Panel Unit Root. Prague Economic Papers, 15(1), 44-49. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.275
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Ahmed, S., Rogers, J. (1995), "Government Budget Deficits and Trade Deficits. Are Present Value Constraints Satisfied in Long-Term Data?" Journal of Monetary Economics 36 (2), pp. 351-374. Go to original source...
    2. Apergis, N., Katrakilidis, K. P., Tabakis, N. M. (2000), "Current Account Deficit Sustainability: The Case of Greece." Applied Economics Letters, 7, pp. 599-603. Go to original source...
    3. Dickey, D., Fuller, W. (1979), "Distribution of Autoregressive Time Series with Unit Root." Journal of the American Statistical Association 74, pp. 427-431. Go to original source...
    4. Dickey, D., Fuller, W. (1981), "The Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root." Econometrica 49, pp. 1057-1072. Go to original source...
    5. Fountas, S., Wu, J. L. (1999), "Are the U.S. Current Account Deficits Really Sustainable?" International Economic Journal, 13(3), Autumn, pp. 51-58. Go to original source...
    6. Hakkio, C. S. (1995), "The U.S. Current Account: The Other Deficit." Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Third Quarter, pp. 11-24.
    7. Hakkio, C. S., Rush, M. (1991), "Is the Budget Deficit "Too Large?" Economic Inquiry, 39 (July), pp. 429-445. Go to original source...
    8. Hamilton, J. D., Flavin M. A. (1986), "On the Limitations of Government Borrowing: A Framework for Empirical Testing." American Economic Review, 76(4), pp. 808-819.
    9. Husted S. (1992), "The Emerging U.S. Current Account Deficit in the 1980s: A Cointegration Analysis." The Review of Economics & Statics, February, pp. 159-166. Go to original source...
    10. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. (1997), "Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogenous Panels." University of Cambridge, Department of Applied Economics.
    11. Kao, C. (1999), "Spurious Regression and Residual Based Tests for Cointegration in Panel Data." Working Paper, Center of Policy Research, Syracuse University, New York. Go to original source...
    12. Levin, A., Lin, C. F. (1992), "Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties." University of San California, San Diego, Discussion Paper No: 92-93.
    13. Levin, A., Lin, C. F. (1993), "Unit Root Test in Panel Data: New Results." University of San California, San Diego, Discussion Paper No: 93-56.
    14. Liu, P. C., Tanner, E. (1996), "International Intertemporal Solvency in Industrialized Countries: Evidence and Implications." Southern Economic Journal, 62(3), pp. 739-49. Go to original source...
    15. Maddala, G. S., Wu, S. (1999), "A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data a New Simple Test." Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Special Issue, 61, pp. 631-652. Go to original source...
    16. Quah, D. (1994), "Exploiting Cross-Section Variation for Unit Root Inference in Dynamic Data." Economic Letters, 44, pp. 9-19. Go to original source...
    17. Sawada, Y. (1994), "Are the Heavily Indebted Countries Solvent?: Tests of Intertemporal Borrowing Constraints." Journal of Development Economics, 45, pp. 325-337. Go to original source...
    18. Tanner, E., Liu, P. (1994), "Is the Budget Deficit 'Too Large'?: Some Further Evidence." Economic Inquiry, 32, pp. 511-518. Go to original source...
    19. Taylor, M., Sarno, L. (1998), "The Behaviour of Real Exchanges during the Post-Brettonwoods Period." Journal of International Economics 46, pp. 281-312. Go to original source...
    20. Trehan, B., Walsh, C. (1991), "Testing Intertemporal Budget Constraints: Theory and Applications to U.S. Federal Budget and Current Account Deficits." Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 23 (2), pp. 206-223. Go to original source...
    21. Wilcox, D. (1989), "The Sustainability of Government Deficits: Implications of the Present-Value Borrowing Constraint." Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 21 (3), pp. 291-306. Go to original source...
    22. Wu, J. L. (2000), "Mean Reversion of the Current Account: Evidence From the Panel Data Unit-Root Test." Economics Letters, 66, pp. 215-222. Go to original source...
    23. Wu, J. L., Stilianos, F. Chen, S. L. (1996), "Testing for the Sustainability of the Current Account Deficit in Two Industrial Countries." Economics Letters, 52(2), pp. 193-198. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content